Ida M. Johnson
- Health top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert T. SiglerBronwen LichtensteinJulia L. NewtonJ. LawsonDoris‐Eva BamiouFrances HeidensohnMarianne BrydøyHege Sagstuen Haugnes
- Topics
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence (18 papers)Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (9 papers)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsQJM
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwaySweden
In The Last Decade
Ida M. Johnson
34 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Health 373
- Sociology and Political Science 336
- Gender Studies 185
- Clinical Psychology 169
- General Health Professions 118
Countries citing papers authored by Ida M. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Ida M. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ida M. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ida M. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ida M. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ida M. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ida M. Johnson. The network helps show where Ida M. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ida M. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ida M. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ida M. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ida M. Johnson. Ida M. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF CHILD ABUSE | 2 |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 87 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | Agency response to domestic violence: Services provided to battered women. | 15 |
| 20 | 5 |
About Ida M. Johnson
Ida M. Johnson is a scholar working on Health, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (18 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (9 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (373 citations), Gender Studies (185 citations) and Clinical Psychology (169 citations). Ida M. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Robert T. Sigler, Bronwen Lichtenstein, Julia L. Newton, J. Lawson, Doris‐Eva Bamiou, Frances Heidensohn, Marianne Brydøy, Hege Sagstuen Haugnes, Carl W. Langberg and Anders Kjellman. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and QJM.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.