Ian Phillips

2.6k total citations
53 papers, 878 citations indexed

About

Ian Phillips is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Ian Phillips has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 878 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 6 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Ian Phillips's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers). Ian Phillips is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (11 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers). Ian Phillips collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Ian Phillips's co-authors include Robert W. Kentridge, Ned Block, Megan A. K. Peters, Chaz Firestone, Pamela Hunter, D.F. Sahm, Marc Struelens, Douglas Taylor, R. Bywater and Anthony R. White and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Lancet.

In The Last Decade

Ian Phillips

45 papers receiving 820 citations

Peers

Ian Phillips
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 430
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 302
  • Philosophy 117
  • History and Philosophy of Science 85
  • Social Psychology 81
Replace Wilhelm Wundt with:
Wilhelm Wundt Germany
Robert A. Power United Kingdom
Dorothee Maria Gescher Germany
Joseph S. Brown United States
Kevin Cole United States
Emily Walsh United States
Richa Gawande United States
Erlinda R. Ulloa United States
Florence Fraisse France
Kimberly C. Lindfield United States
Wilhelm Wundt Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ian Phillips
Ian Phillips · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ian Phillips
Ian Phillips · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Phillips

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Phillips's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Phillips with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Phillips more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Phillips

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Phillips. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Phillips. The network helps show where Ian Phillips may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Phillips

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Phillips. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Phillips based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Phillips. Ian Phillips is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 1
4 1
5 0
6 3
7 9
8 1
9 4
10
Scepticism about Unconscious Perception is the Default Hypothesis
11
11
Austerity and Illusion
8
12 10
13 57
14 13
15 52
16 1
17 105
18 14
19 1
20 6

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026