Ian O. Angell

651 citations
44 papers · 354 indexed · h-index 12

Ian O. Angell

41 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Ian O. Angell
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Management Information Systems 70
  • Communication 34
  • Information Systems 80
  • Computer Science Applications 18
  • Sociology and Political Science 141
Replace Walt Crawford with:
Walt Crawford United States
Mehdi Khosrowpour United States
Ronald Arthur Gerard Weber Australia
Andrea Resca Italy
Herbert Kubicek Germany
Bella Hass Weinberg United States
Oliver Müller Germany
Karen Patten United States
Dionysios S. Demetis United Kingdom
Seongmin Jeon South Korea
Ian O. Angell relative to Walt Crawford United States Walt Crawford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Walt Crawford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian O. Angell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian O. Angell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian O. Angell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian O. Angell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian O. Angell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian O. Angell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian O. Angell. The network helps show where Ian O. Angell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Ian O. Angell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian O. Angell Line = papers co-authored together Ian O. Angell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Generation-C: Creative Consumers in a World of Intellectual Property Rights
20142
2
The power of discretion in IS security
20103
3 201012
4
The Risk of Computerised Bureaucracy
20091
5 20092
6
Ethics and Morality - a business opportunity for the Amoral?
20073
7 200624
8 20066
9
Systemic risk re-defining digital security
20051
10
Anti-money laundering - avoiding the technology trap
20041
11
The New Barbarian Manifesto: How to Survive the Information Age
200031
12 19967
13 199217
14 19901
15 19909
16 19872
17 198711
18 19871
19 19852
20 19832

About Ian O. Angell

Ian O. Angell is a scholar working on Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Management Information Systems and Business and International Management, having authored 44 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information Systems Theories and Implementation (5 papers), Information Technology Governance and Strategy (5 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (4 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (4 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers), Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (2 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (2 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (70 citations), Communication (34 citations) and Information Systems (80 citations). Ian O. Angell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Steve Smithson, Dionysios S. Demetis, Jan Kietzmann, Steve New, Simon Davies, Edgar A. Whitley, Kenneth E. Kendall, Julie E. Kendall, Gareth Griffith and Moreton Moore.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026