Ian Goldman

523 citations
25 papers · 254 indexed · h-index 10

Ian Goldman

21 papers receiving 188 citations

Peers

Ian Goldman
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Public Administration 52
  • Management Science and Operations Research 133
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27
  • Finance 29
  • Information Systems and Management 19
Replace Keith Mackay with:
Keith Mackay Australia
Elliot Stern United Kingdom
Osvaldo N. Feinstein Spain
Murray Stewart United Kingdom
Elaine Morley United States
Jim Millington United Kingdom
Nicholas Awortwi Netherlands
Joanne Murphy United Kingdom
Carlos Aurélio Pimenta de Faria Brazil
Gary Banks Australia
Ian Goldman relative to Keith Mackay Australia Keith Mackay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Keith Mackay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Goldman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Goldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Goldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Goldman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Goldman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Goldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Goldman. The network helps show where Ian Goldman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ian Goldman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Goldman Line = papers co-authored together Ian Goldman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20242
3 20230
4 20231
5 20202
6 202019
7 20203
8 201913
9 20156
10 201514
11 20151
12 201510
13 20149
14 201419
15 201353
16
African Monitoring and Evaluation Systems: Exploratory Case Studies
20122
17
Goodbye to projects? The institutional impact of sustainable livelihoods approaches on development interventions 5. Lessons from rural livelihoods interventions.
20043
18 20043
19
Institutional support for sustainable rural livelihoods in Southern Africa: results from Zimbabwe, Zambia and South Africa.
200014
20 199535

About Ian Goldman

Ian Goldman is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration and Finance, having authored 25 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (14 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (6 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (2 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (2 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (2 papers) and Agricultural Innovations and Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (52 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (133 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (27 citations). Ian Goldman has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, South Korea and Ivory Coast. Frequent co-authors include Stephen R. Porter, David Clark, Nigel Berkeley, Brian Ilbery, Laı̈la Smith, Sean Phillips, David J. Howlett, Stephen Taylor, Mark E. Everett and Richard Manning. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of International Development and European Urban and Regional Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026