Ian G. Barbour
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Education top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jennifer M. BaileyRobert W. FriedrichsEugene E. SelkErwin SchrödingerEarl R. MacCormacRobert G. Jones
- Topics
- Evolution and Science Education (13 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (7 papers)Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (7 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of PhysicsJournal for the Scientific Study of ReligionReview of Religious Research
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ian G. Barbour
33 papers receiving 754 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Sociology and Political Science 455
- Philosophy 241
- History and Philosophy of Science 234
- Education 172
- Health 150
Countries citing papers authored by Ian G. Barbour
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian G. Barbour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian G. Barbour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian G. Barbour more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian G. Barbour
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian G. Barbour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian G. Barbour. The network helps show where Ian G. Barbour may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian G. Barbour
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian G. Barbour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian G. Barbour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian G. Barbour. Ian G. Barbour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | When science meets religion: [enemies, strangers, or partners?] | 96 |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 221 | |
| 10 | Religion and Science | 14 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Western Man and Environmental Ethics: Attitudes Toward Nature and Technology. | 21 |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 86 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Ian G. Barbour
Ian G. Barbour is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Religious studies, having authored 39 papers that have together received 976 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (13 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (7 papers) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (234 citations), Philosophy (241 citations) and Religious studies (99 citations). Ian G. Barbour has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer M. Bailey, Robert W. Friedrichs, Eugene E. Selk, Erwin Schrödinger, Earl R. MacCormac and Robert G. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physics, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion and Review of Religious Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.