Ian Forbes
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Co-authors
- Caroline HomerYun‐Hee JeonMaralyn FoureurNicky LeapJane Stein‐ParburyRichard FlemingDeborah DavisMarion Haas
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers)Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers)
- Journals
- International PsychogeriatricsMidwiferyAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Ian Forbes
9 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- General Health Professions 165
- Psychiatry and Mental health 89
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 76
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 58
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 40
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Forbes
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Forbes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Forbes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Forbes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Forbes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Forbes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Forbes. The network helps show where Ian Forbes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Forbes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Forbes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Forbes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Forbes. Ian Forbes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 54 | |
| 2 | 87 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 66 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Evidence Based Management in Health Care: the role of decision support systems | 1 |
| 9 | 30 |
About Ian Forbes
Ian Forbes is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 9 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (76 citations), General Health Professions (165 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (89 citations). Ian Forbes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Caroline Homer, Yun‐Hee Jeon, Maralyn Foureur, Nicky Leap, Jane Stein‐Parbury, Richard Fleming, Deborah Davis, Marion Haas, Georgina Luscombe and Lynn Chenoweth. Their work appears in journals such as International Psychogeriatrics, Midwifery and Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.