Ian Fillis

69 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Ian Fillis
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 653
  • Business and International Management 163
  • Urban Studies 427
  • Strategy and Management 733
  • Museology 159
Replace Jamal Shamsie with:
Jamal Shamsie United States
Gino Cattani United States
Patrick Cohendet Canada
Hans Kjellberg Sweden
Michael Saren United Kingdom
Zannie Giraud Voss United States
Stine Grodal United States
Simone Ferriani Italy
Nachoem M. Wijnberg Netherlands
N. Anand United Kingdom
Ian Fillis relative to Jamal Shamsie United States Jamal Shamsie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Jamal Shamsie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Fillis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Fillis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Fillis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Fillis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Fillis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Fillis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Fillis. The network helps show where Ian Fillis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ian Fillis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Fillis Line = papers co-authored together Ian Fillis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20231
3 20230
4 20237
5 20222
6 20227
7 20220
8
Creative Futures for New Contemporary Artists: Opportunities and Barriers
201819
9
Conceptualising the symbolic product: an arts marketing imperative
20165
10 201663
11 201511
12 20146
13 201146
14 200712
15 200632
16 200536
17 200575
18
Factors Impacting on E-Business Adoption and Development in the Smaller Firm
20041
19 2003118
20 2001171

About Ian Fillis

Ian Fillis is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Management of Technology and Innovation, Museology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Strategy and Management, having authored 75 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (31 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (29 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (12 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (11 papers), International Business and FDI (11 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (7 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (7 papers) and Art History and Market Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (653 citations), Business and International Management (163 citations), Urban Studies (427 citations), Strategy and Management (733 citations) and Museology (159 citations). Ian Fillis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Rentschler, Beverly Wagner, Ulf Johansson, B.A. Wagner, Andrew McAuley, Oluwayemisi Adebola Abisuga, Kim Lehman, Mark Wickham, Morgan P. Miles and Ian Fraser. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, International Small Business Journal Researching Entrepreneurship, Cultural Trends, Journal of Marketing Management and Creative Industries Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026