W. Böcker

6.3k total citations
183 papers, 4.7k citations indexed

About

W. Böcker is a scholar working on Oncology, Molecular Biology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Böcker has authored 183 papers receiving a total of 4.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Oncology, 45 papers in Molecular Biology and 42 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in W. Böcker's work include Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (20 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (20 papers). W. Böcker is often cited by papers focused on Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (20 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (20 papers). W. Böcker collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. W. Böcker's co-authors include Igor Buchwalow, Barbara Dockhorn‐Dworniczak, Sören Schröder, Kurt Werner Schmid, Horst Bürger, Christopher Poremba, Dietmar Öfner, Raihanatou Diallo, L. Hertle and Martin Tötsch and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Cancer and Radiology.

In The Last Decade

W. Böcker

173 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

W. Böcker
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Oncology 1.3k
  • Surgery 918
  • Cancer Research 890
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 753
Replace Carla Di Loreto with:
Carla Di Loreto Italy
Mitsuru Emi Japan
Svetlana Pack United States
Nicolas Wernert Germany
Penelope Korkolopoulou Greece
Martha Quezado United States
Daniela Campani Italy
Takesada Mori Japan
Hans Morreau Netherlands
Bassem R. Haddad United States
Carla Di Loreto Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to W. Böcker
W. Böcker · 1×
Citations per year, relative to W. Böcker
W. Böcker · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by W. Böcker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Böcker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Böcker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Böcker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Böcker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Böcker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Böcker. The network helps show where W. Böcker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Böcker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Böcker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Böcker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Böcker. W. Böcker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Trizepssehnenruptur. Reinsertion am Olekranon in Doppelreihentechnik und Übersicht alternativer Techniken
1
2 3
3 8
4 16
5
[Expression of early placenta insulin-like growth factor (EPIL) in breast cancer cells provides an autocrine loop with enhancement of predominantly HER-2-related invasivity].
2
6 22
7 44
8 223
9 11
10 1
11
Duktale Hyperplasie und Duktales Carcinoma in situ Definition – Klassifikation – Differentialdiagnose
3
12 5
13 2
14 23
15 4
16 42
17 97
18 85
19 5
20 0

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026