I Purves

12 papers receiving 505 citations

Peers

I Purves
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 262
  • Health Information Management 198
  • General Health Professions 162
  • Molecular Biology 157
  • Economics and Econometrics 87
Replace Scott P. Narus with:
Scott P. Narus United States
C. Safran United States
Mary Morgan United States
Robert A. Jenders United States
H Heathfield United Kingdom
J. L. Callen Australia
Neil S. Fleming United States
Rushika Fernandopulle United States
Elaine B. Steen United States
Rita D. Zielstorff United States
I Purves relative to Scott P. Narus United States Scott P. Narus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Scott P. Narus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I Purves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I Purves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I Purves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I Purves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I Purves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I Purves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I Purves. The network helps show where I Purves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I Purves

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I Purves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I Purves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I Purves. I Purves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 19
2
A virtual medical record for guideline-based decision support.
70
3 37
4
Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care.
93
5
The PRODIGY Knowledge Architecture Requirements for Chronic Disease Management in Primary Care.
1
6
The PRODIGY project--the iterative development of the release one model.
45
7
PILs Project Summary report: Ensuring the Readability, Understandability and Efficacy of Patient Information Leaflets
3
8 56
9 152
10 43
11
Computerised guidelines in primary health care: reflections and implications.
13
12
Coding and Nomenclatures: A Snapshot from Around the World
1
13 19

About I Purves

I Purves is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 13 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical practice guidelines implementation (7 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (198 citations), Medical Terminology (3 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations). I Purves has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. Johnson, Samson W. Tu, Jeremy Grimshaw, Bernard Higgins, Nick Booth, Ian Russell, Philip C. Adams, M. Eccles, Stephen Kay and Mark A. Musen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, International Journal of Medical Informatics and Family Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026