Nick Steen

6.6k citations
89 papers · 5.2k · h-index 39

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Steen

89 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Nick Steen
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 898
  • Applied Psychology 167
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 64
  • General Health Professions 755
  • Rehabilitation 196
Replace Michelle Johnston with:
Michelle Johnston United States
Cynthia R. Gross United States
Miel W. Ribbe Netherlands
Diane J. Wild United Kingdom
Domingo Palacios‐Ceña Spain
Michael Von Korff United States
Wilco P. Achterberg Netherlands
Debbie Sharp United Kingdom
Christine M. Bond United Kingdom
Paul Stolee Canada
Nick Steen relative to Michelle Johnston United States Michelle Johnston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Michelle Johnston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Steen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Steen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Steen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Steen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Steen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Steen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Steen. The network helps show where Nick Steen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Steen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Steen Line = papers co-authored together Nick Steen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996535
2 2000258
3 2000257
4 2001249
5 2014243
6 2001183
7 2010165
8 2003157
9 1999153
10 2014127
11 2011125
12 1999108
13 2007105
14 2003102
15 200398
16 200488
17 201284
18 200683
19 201481
20 201380

About Nick Steen

Nick Steen is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Neurology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 89 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (5 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (5 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (898 citations), Applied Psychology (167 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (64 citations), General Health Professions (755 citations) and Rehabilitation (196 citations). Nick Steen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Grimshaw, Ann Jacoby, Martin Eccles, Gus A. Baker, Marie Johnston, Marion Campbell, David William Chadwick, Marko J. Elovainio, Nigel Berry Pitts and Gary A. Ford. Their work appears in journals such as Implementation Science, Trials, Health Technology Assessment, BMC Health Services Research and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact