I. K. W. Kleiser

922 total citations
11 papers, 160 citations indexed

About

I. K. W. Kleiser is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, I. K. W. Kleiser has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 160 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 1 paper in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in I. K. W. Kleiser's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (3 papers). I. K. W. Kleiser is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (3 papers). I. K. W. Kleiser collaborates with scholars based in United States and Hungary. I. K. W. Kleiser's co-authors include Daniel Kasen, A. V. Filippenko, J. M. Silverman, M. Ganeshalingam, Schuyler D. Van Dyk, Weidong Li, Jim Fuller, Paul C. Duffell, Andrew F. Boden and R. J. Foley and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters.

In The Last Decade

I. K. W. Kleiser

10 papers receiving 156 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
I. K. W. Kleiser United States	6	159	46	16	3	2	11	160
K. Takáts Hungary	6	153 1.0×	53 1.2×	12 0.8×	3 1.0×	4 2.0×	13	156
A. Pastorello United Kingdom	5	210 1.3×	68 1.5×	21 1.3×	3 1.0×		7	210
T. N. Steele United States	4	156 1.0×	47 1.0×	8 0.5×	2 0.7×	1 0.5×	7	158
S. Castellón Chile	3	123 0.8×	43 0.9×	9 0.6×	2 0.7×	1 0.5×	3	124
M. Kiewe Canada	2	222 1.4×	85 1.8×	20 1.3×	2 0.7×		3	222
O. Fox United States	7	188 1.2×	56 1.2×	15 0.9×	1 0.3×	2 1.0×	16	188
R. Covarrubias Chile	6	188 1.2×	67 1.5×	23 1.4×		2 1.0×	13	193
A. Zeh Germany	5	237 1.5×	47 1.0×	16 1.0×		3 1.5×	7	237
J. Botyánszki United States	5	189 1.2×	61 1.3×	16 1.0×			5	190

Countries citing papers authored by I. K. W. Kleiser

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. K. W. Kleiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. K. W. Kleiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. K. W. Kleiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. K. W. Kleiser

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. K. W. Kleiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. K. W. Kleiser. The network helps show where I. K. W. Kleiser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. K. W. Kleiser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. K. W. Kleiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. K. W. Kleiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. K. W. Kleiser. I. K. W. Kleiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Kleiser, I. K. W., Daniel Kasen, & Paul C. Duffell. (2018). Models of bright nickel-free supernovae from stripped massive stars with circumstellar shells. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 475(3). 3152–3164. 13 indexed citations

2.

Kleiser, I. K. W., Jim Fuller, & Daniel Kasen. (2018). Helium giant stars as progenitors of rapidly fading Type Ibc supernovae. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters. 481(1). L141–L145. 13 indexed citations

3.

Shivvers, I., WeiKang Zheng, Jon C. Mauerhan, et al.. (2016). SN 2015U: a rapidly evolving and luminous Type Ibn supernova. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 461(3). 3057–3074. 20 indexed citations

4.

Kleiser, I. K. W. & Daniel Kasen. (2013). Rapidly fading supernovae from massive star explosions. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 438(1). 318–328. 34 indexed citations

5.

Kleiser, I. K. W., D. Poznanski, Daniel Kasen, et al.. (2011). Peculiar Type II supernovae from blue supergiants. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 415(1). 372–382. 36 indexed citations

6.

Silverman, J. M., et al.. (2010). Supernovae 2010an, 2010ao, 2010au, and 2010al. 2223. 1.

7.

Quimby, R., S. Kulkarni, E. O. Ofek, et al.. (2010). Discovery of a Luminous Supernova, PTF10cwr. ATel. 2492. 1. 1 indexed citations

8.

Cenko, S. B., B. E. Cobb, I. K. W. Kleiser, & A. V. Filippenko. (2010). Supernova 2010aj in MCG -01-32-35. 2209. 1. 1 indexed citations

9.

Elias–Rosa, N., Schuyler D. Van Dyk, Weidong Li, et al.. (2010). THE MASSIVE PROGENITOR OF THE TYPE II-LINEAR SUPERNOVA 2009kr. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 714(2). L254–L259. 40 indexed citations

10.

Kleiser, I. K. W., et al.. (2009). Supernova 2009ig in NGC 1015. 1918. 1. 1 indexed citations

11.

Chornock, R., et al.. (2009). GRB 090418 Lick redshift.. GCN. 9151. 1. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact