Huw Lewis
- Atmospheric Science top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Earth-Surface Processes top 10%
- Environmental Engineering
- Co-authors
- Andrew SaulterJohn SiddornJohn EdwardsJuan Manuel Castillo SanchezJoachim FallmannI. D. CulverwellAlex ArnoldChristian Marquardt
- Topics
- Climate variability and models (18 papers)Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (14 papers)Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (12 papers)
- Journals
- Geophysical Research LettersQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietyRemote Sensing
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Huw Lewis
38 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Atmospheric Science 352
- Global and Planetary Change 320
- Oceanography 222
- Earth-Surface Processes 77
- Environmental Engineering 66
Countries citing papers authored by Huw Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Huw Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huw Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huw Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Huw Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huw Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huw Lewis. The network helps show where Huw Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Huw Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Huw Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Huw Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Huw Lewis. Huw Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 34 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | Local vertical profile corrections using data from multiple scan elevations | 1 |
About Huw Lewis
Huw Lewis is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Oceanography and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 39 papers that have together received 548 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (18 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (14 papers) and Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (352 citations), Oceanography (222 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (320 citations). Huw Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Saulter, John Siddorn, John Edwards, Juan Manuel Castillo Sanchez, Joachim Fallmann, I. D. Culverwell, Alex Arnold, Christian Marquardt, Adrian Lock and Peter Robins. Their work appears in journals such as Geophysical Research Letters, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society and Remote Sensing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.