Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Health top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Anne Donadey
- Topics
- Islamic Studies and History (5 papers)South Asian Cinema and Culture (4 papers)Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh
15 papers receiving 221 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Sociology and Political Science 136
- Gender Studies 99
- Political Science and International Relations 82
- Health 64
- General Health Professions 42
Countries citing papers authored by Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh
This map shows the geographic impact of Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh. The network helps show where Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh. Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Asian Muslim women : globalization and local realities | 1 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Introduction: Gender and Islam in Asia | 2 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | Dilemmas of Islamic and Secular Feminists and Feminisms | 17 |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | Ahmadi Women Reconciling Faith with Vulnerable Reality through Education | 3 |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | Portraits of Believers: Ahmadi Women Performing Faith in the Diaspora | 5 |
| 10 | 88 | |
| 11 | A History of Women in Afghanistan: Lessons Learnt for the Future or Yesterdays and Tomorrow: Women in Afghanistan | 63 |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 8 |
About Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh
Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Gender Studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 279 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (5 papers), South Asian Cinema and Culture (4 papers) and Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (99 citations), Health (64 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (17 citations). Huma Ahmed‐Ghosh has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Anne Donadey. Their work appears in journals such as Violence Against Women, Signs and International Feminist Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.