Hugh Sims-Williams

645 citations
22 papers · 414 indexed · h-index 13
Topics
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers)Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers)

In The Last Decade

Hugh Sims-Williams

22 papers receiving 378 citations

Peers

Hugh Sims-Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Pharmacology 146
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 138
  • Surgery 104
  • Neurology 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 60
Replace Boris Spektor with:
Boris Spektor United States
Amole Khadilkar Canada
Nicholas Shenker United Kingdom
Tina L Doshi United States
Kayleigh De Meulemeester Belgium
Loren M. Fishman United States
Brigitte Tampin Australia
Emmanuele Tafuri Italy
S. Ramamurthy United States
Christina WY Hui-Chan Hong Kong
Hugh Sims-Williams relative to Boris Spektor United States Boris Spektor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Boris Spektor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Sims-Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Sims-Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Sims-Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Sims-Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Sims-Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Sims-Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Sims-Williams. The network helps show where Hugh Sims-Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Sims-Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Sims-Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Sims-Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Sims-Williams. Hugh Sims-Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 1
3 4
4 12
5 4
6 6
7 28
8 19
9 21
10 56
11 16
12 14
13 24
14 1
15 3
16 33
17 48
18 71
19 14
20 6

About Hugh Sims-Williams

Hugh Sims-Williams is a scholar working on Neurology, Neurology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 22 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (146 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (138 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (37 citations). Hugh Sims-Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M I Jayson, H Baddeley, E. Collins, Nikunj K. Patel, Anthony E. Pickering, Benjamin C. Warf, J.C. Brooks, Julian C. Matthews, Peter S. Talbot and Sarah Love‐Jones. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Spine and Hypertension.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026