Brigitte Tampin

812 total citations
38 papers, 553 citations indexed

About

Brigitte Tampin is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Physiology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Brigitte Tampin has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 553 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Pharmacology, 20 papers in Physiology and 12 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Brigitte Tampin's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (22 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (20 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (12 papers). Brigitte Tampin is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (22 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (20 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (12 papers). Brigitte Tampin collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United Kingdom. Brigitte Tampin's co-authors include Helen Slater, Annina B. Schmid, Louise Hailey, Toby Hall, Gabriel Lee, Roger Goucke, Angela Jacques, N. Kathryn Briffa, Chad Cook and Scott F. Farrell and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Pain and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Brigitte Tampin

33 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Brigitte Tampin Australia 13 302 242 136 129 125 38 553
Andy Chien Taiwan 14 304 1.0× 159 0.7× 173 1.3× 33 0.3× 176 1.4× 29 570
Koen Van Boxem Belgium 13 313 1.0× 147 0.6× 299 2.2× 54 0.4× 248 2.0× 27 589
David Abejón Spain 13 322 1.1× 205 0.8× 129 0.9× 25 0.2× 122 1.0× 46 561
J. Altmeppen Germany 9 255 0.8× 198 0.8× 91 0.7× 23 0.2× 110 0.9× 23 596
Loren M. Fishman United States 14 226 0.7× 61 0.3× 111 0.8× 344 2.7× 331 2.6× 29 822
Sandra Jiménez‐del‐Barrio Spain 16 181 0.6× 54 0.2× 40 0.3× 146 1.1× 271 2.2× 68 603
M. Jensen United States 4 346 1.1× 404 1.7× 80 0.6× 17 0.1× 86 0.7× 10 702
Luis Ceballos‐Laita Spain 14 171 0.6× 54 0.2× 37 0.3× 106 0.8× 219 1.8× 65 552
Elina Iordanova Schistad Norway 16 325 1.1× 205 0.8× 266 2.0× 12 0.1× 104 0.8× 21 590
Shoshana Daniel United States 12 186 0.6× 172 0.7× 46 0.3× 11 0.1× 99 0.8× 19 579

Countries citing papers authored by Brigitte Tampin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brigitte Tampin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brigitte Tampin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brigitte Tampin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brigitte Tampin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brigitte Tampin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brigitte Tampin. The network helps show where Brigitte Tampin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brigitte Tampin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brigitte Tampin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brigitte Tampin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brigitte Tampin. Brigitte Tampin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Schmid, Annina B., Louise Hailey, Mohamed Tachrount, et al.. (2023). Factors predicting the transition from acute to persistent pain in people with ‘sciatica’: the FORECAST longitudinal prognostic factor cohort study protocol. BMJ Open. 13(4). e072832–e072832. 2 indexed citations
3.
Jacques, Angela, et al.. (2023). Short- and long-term test–retest reliability of the English version of the 7-item DN4 questionnaire – a screening tool for neuropathic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 23(3). 494–500. 1 indexed citations
4.
Luedtke, Kerstin, et al.. (2023). Inter- and intra-rater-reliability of a clinical framework for spine-related neck-arm pain. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 67. 102853–102853. 3 indexed citations
5.
Lascurain‐Aguirrebeña, Ion, Laura Domínguez, Javier Ballesteros, et al.. (2023). Effectiveness of neural mobilisation for the treatment of nerve-related cervicobrachial pain: a systematic review with subgroup meta-analysis. Pain. 165(3). 537–549. 3 indexed citations
6.
Schmid, Annina B., Brigitte Tampin, Ralf Baron, et al.. (2023). Recommendations for terminology and the identification of neuropathic pain in people with spine-related leg pain. Outcomes from the NeuPSIG working group. Pain. 164(8). 1693–1704. 21 indexed citations
7.
Tampin, Brigitte, Christopher R. P. Lind, Angela Jacques, & Helen Slater. (2021). Disentangling ‘sciatica’ to understand and characterise somatosensory profiles and potential pain mechanisms. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 22(1). 48–58. 5 indexed citations
8.
Schmid, Annina B., et al.. (2021). [Entrapment neuropathies: a contemporary approach to pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and management : German version].. Der Schmerz. 35(6). 419–433. 1 indexed citations
9.
Tampin, Brigitte. (2020). Nervenschmerz ≠ Nervenschmerz. manuelletherapie. 24(1). 21–27. 2 indexed citations
10.
Ballenberger, Nikolaus, et al.. (2020). Somatosensory profiles in patients with non-specific neck-arm pain with and without positive neurodynamic tests. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 50. 102261–102261. 9 indexed citations
11.
Tampin, Brigitte, et al.. (2019). Field testing of the revised neuropathic pain grading system in a cohort of patients with neck and upper limb pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 19(3). 523–532. 11 indexed citations
12.
Tampin, Brigitte, et al.. (2019). Psychological factors can cause false pain classification on painDETECT. Scandinavian Journal of Pain. 19(3). 501–512. 9 indexed citations
13.
Briggs, Andrew M., Marie Deverell, Samantha Bunzli, et al.. (2019). Integrated prevention and management of non-communicable diseases, including musculoskeletal health: a systematic policy analysis among OECD countries. BMJ Global Health. 4(5). e001806–e001806. 42 indexed citations
14.
Schmid, Annina B., Louise Hailey, & Brigitte Tampin. (2018). Entrapment Neuropathies: Challenging Common Beliefs With Novel Evidence. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. 48(2). 58–62. 31 indexed citations
15.
Tampin, Brigitte, Jan Vollert, & Annina B. Schmid. (2018). Sensory profiles are comparable in patients with distal and proximal entrapment neuropathies, while the pain experience differs. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 34(11). 1899–1906. 20 indexed citations
16.
Beales, Darren, et al.. (2017). Characterisation of pain in people with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy. Journal of Neurology. 264(12). 2464–2471. 8 indexed citations
17.
Tampin, Brigitte, et al.. (2017). Reliability of the English version of the painDETECT questionnaire. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 33(4). 741–748. 19 indexed citations
18.
Tampin, Brigitte, et al.. (2013). Identification of neuropathic pain in patients with neck/upper limb pain: Application of a grading system and screening tools. Pain. 154(12). 2813–2822. 41 indexed citations
20.
Tampin, Brigitte, et al.. (2012). Inter-therapist agreement in classifying patients with cervical radiculopathy and patients with non-specific neck–arm pain. Manual Therapy. 17(5). 445–450. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026