Hugh Firth
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- P. G. BrittonPaul McKeownT. P. BerneyRobert BaloghP McKeownDerek MilneIan A. JamesIan Oswald
- Topics
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (6 papers)Sleep and related disorders (5 papers)Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Hugh Firth
28 papers receiving 628 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- General Health Professions 376
- Clinical Psychology 245
- Social Psychology 161
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 152
- Sociology and Political Science 88
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Firth
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Firth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Firth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Firth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Firth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Firth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Firth. The network helps show where Hugh Firth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Firth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Firth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Firth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Firth. Hugh Firth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 35 | |
| 3 | 95 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | Client satisfaction with the New Zealand National Poisons Information Service. | 3 |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 199 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | Burn-out, personality and support in long-stay nursing. | 6 |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | 43 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Vibration and praise as reinforcers for mentally handicapped people. | 10 |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Hugh Firth
Hugh Firth is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (6 papers), Sleep and related disorders (5 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (38 citations), Leadership and Management (19 citations) and General Health Professions (376 citations). Hugh Firth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include P. G. Britton, Paul McKeown, T. P. Berney, Robert Balogh, P McKeown, Derek Milne, Ian A. James, Ian Oswald, Nick Steen and Senga Bond. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The British Journal of Psychiatry and British Journal of Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.