Houston Smit

558 citations
9 papers · 94 · h-index 6

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
    • War, Ethics, and Justification
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
    • Historical Philosophy and Science

Papers in

    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 6
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 2
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 1
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 1
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 1
    • Historical Philosophy and Science 2

Houston Smit

9 papers receiving 74 citations

Peers

Houston Smit
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
  • Philosophy 73
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
  • General Social Sciences 3
  • Theoretical Computer Science 1
Replace Corey W. Dyck with:
Corey W. Dyck Canada
Wayne Waxman United States
Konstantin Pollok United States
Desmond Hogan United States
Clinton Tolley United States
Michelle Grier United States
Samuel Newlands United States
Ido Geiger Israel
Julian Wuerth United States
Dennis Schulting Netherlands
Houston Smit relative to Corey W. Dyck Canada Corey W. Dyck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Corey W. Dyck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Houston Smit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Houston Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Houston Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Houston Smit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Houston Smit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Houston Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Houston Smit. The network helps show where Houston Smit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Houston Smit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Houston Smit Line = papers co-authored together Houston Smit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown

About Houston Smit

Houston Smit is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Infectious Diseases, having authored 9 papers that have together received 94 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (2 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (1 paper), Political Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (73 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (34 citations), General Social Sciences (3 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (1 citation). Houston Smit has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Timmons. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Pacific philosophical quarterly, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, The Journal of Ethics and Canadian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact