Ido Geiger

469 total citations
18 papers, 119 citations indexed

About

Ido Geiger is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ido Geiger has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 119 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Philosophy, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ido Geiger's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (13 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers). Ido Geiger is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (13 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers). Ido Geiger collaborates with scholars based in Israel and Germany. Ido Geiger's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Journal of Philosophy of Education and Inquiry.

In The Last Decade

Ido Geiger

16 papers receiving 102 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ido Geiger Israel	7	99	27	26	24	19	18	119
Melissa Merritt Australia	7	100 1.0×	25 0.9×	20 0.8×	18 0.8×	22 1.2×	19	122
Jane Kneller United States	4	91 0.9×	15 0.6×	22 0.8×	27 1.1×	30 1.6×	10	132
Julian Wuerth United States	6	75 0.8×	20 0.7×	27 1.0×	11 0.5×	21 1.1×	7	94
Hans Johann Glock United Kingdom	5	60 0.6×	21 0.8×	35 1.3×	24 1.0×	7 0.4×	13	100
Thomas Raleigh Germany	7	86 0.9×	58 2.1×	70 2.7×	23 1.0×	12 0.6×	19	136
Luca Ferrero United States	7	104 1.1×	77 2.9×	32 1.2×	14 0.6×	17 0.9×	17	146
Wayne Waxman United States	6	80 0.8×	11 0.4×	39 1.5×	36 1.5×	15 0.8×	15	106
Avner Baz United States	7	133 1.3×	31 1.1×	80 3.1×	37 1.5×	7 0.4×	26	177
Lisa Shapiro Canada	7	78 0.8×	20 0.7×	16 0.6×	94 3.9×	12 0.6×	17	153
H. A. Prichard	4	93 0.9×	43 1.6×	47 1.8×	22 0.9×	15 0.8×	5	139

Countries citing papers authored by Ido Geiger

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ido Geiger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ido Geiger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ido Geiger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ido Geiger

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ido Geiger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ido Geiger. The network helps show where Ido Geiger may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

1.

Geiger, Ido. (2024). Intuitional Content or Avoiding the Myth of the Given – A Dilemma for McDowell. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 32(3). 272–293.

2.

Geiger, Ido, et al.. (2023). Kant's missing analytic of artistic beauty. European Journal of Philosophy. 32(2). 360–377. 2 indexed citations

3.

Geiger, Ido. (2022). Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 8 indexed citations

4.

Geiger, Ido. (2022). Kant and the Claims of the Empirical World: A Transcendental Reading of the Critique of the Power of Judgment. 4 indexed citations

5.

Geiger, Ido, et al.. (2021). Batteux, Kant and Schiller on fine art and moral education. Journal of Philosophy of Education. 55(6). 1142–1158. 2 indexed citations

6.

Geiger, Ido. (2021). Kant on Aesthetic Ideas, Rational Ideas and the Subject-Matter of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 79(2). 186–199. 11 indexed citations

7.

Geiger, Ido. (2020). Aesthetic Normativity and the Acquisition of Empirical Concepts. 1(12). 71–104. 3 indexed citations

8.

Geiger, Ido. (2020). Humanity and personality – what, for Kant, is the source of moral normativity?. Inquiry. 66(4). 565–588. 3 indexed citations

9.

Geiger, Ido, et al.. (2018). Natural Beauty, Fine Art and the Relation between Them. Kant-Studien. 109(1). 72–100. 14 indexed citations

10.

Geiger, Ido. (2015). How Do We Acquire Moral Knowledge? Is Knowing Our Duty Ever Passive? – Two Questions for Martin Sticker. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 23(5). 990–997. 3 indexed citations

11.

Geiger, Ido. (2015). How Are the Different Formulas of the Categorical Imperative Related?. Kantian Review. 20(3). 395–419. 8 indexed citations

12.

Geiger, Ido. (2011). Rational Feelings and Moral Agency. Kantian Review. 16(2). 283–308. 17 indexed citations

13.

Geiger, Ido. (2010). What is the Use of the Universal Law Formula of the Categorical Imperative?. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 18(2). 271–295. 12 indexed citations

14.

Geiger, Ido. (2009). Is Teleological Judgement (Still) Necessary? Kant's Arguments in the Analytic and in the Dialectic of Teleological Judgement 1. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 17(3). 533–566. 3 indexed citations

15.

Geiger, Ido. (2007). The Founding Act of Modern Ethical Life. Stanford University Press eBooks. 5 indexed citations

16.

Geiger, Ido. (2007). The Founding Act of Modern Ethical Life: Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Moral and Political Philosophy. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations

17.

Geiger, Ido. (2005). Is Art a Thing of the Past?. Idealistic Studies. 35(2). 173–195. 1 indexed citations

18.

Geiger, Ido. (2003). Is the Assumption of a Systematic Whole of Empirical Concepts a Necessary Condition of Knowledge?. Kant-Studien. 94(3). 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact