Honorata Mazepus

1.1k total citations
31 papers, 234 citations indexed

About

Honorata Mazepus is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Honorata Mazepus has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 234 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Honorata Mazepus's work include Political Conflict and Governance (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). Honorata Mazepus is often cited by papers focused on Political Conflict and Governance (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). Honorata Mazepus collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Denmark and Norway. Honorata Mazepus's co-authors include Dimiter Toshkov, Florian van Leeuwen, Wouter Veenendaal, Magnus Feldmann, Dovilė Rimkutė, Антоанета Димитрова, Nikoleta Yordanova, Scott Bokemper, Peter DeScioli and Alexander Bor and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Public Administration Review and Comparative Political Studies.

In The Last Decade

Honorata Mazepus

26 papers receiving 217 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Honorata Mazepus Netherlands 9 154 125 27 24 20 31 234
Renato Perissinotto Brazil 9 147 1.0× 153 1.2× 13 0.5× 34 1.4× 19 0.9× 53 255
Ireneusz Paweł Karolewski Poland 11 278 1.8× 149 1.2× 22 0.8× 18 0.8× 13 0.7× 44 371
Andrew Sabl United States 11 237 1.5× 123 1.0× 11 0.4× 18 0.8× 36 1.8× 29 320
Gary Prévost United States 8 100 0.6× 150 1.2× 19 0.7× 14 0.6× 8 0.4× 52 246
Chagai Weiss United States 9 156 1.0× 183 1.5× 16 0.6× 15 0.6× 39 1.9× 16 277
Ursula Hoffmann‐Lange Germany 6 134 0.9× 148 1.2× 28 1.0× 13 0.5× 14 0.7× 24 254
Mia Costa United States 8 187 1.2× 144 1.2× 34 1.3× 22 0.9× 55 2.8× 15 298
Daniela R. Piccio Italy 6 130 0.8× 108 0.9× 43 1.6× 11 0.5× 23 1.1× 21 232
Patricia L. Hipsher United States 4 254 1.6× 204 1.6× 16 0.6× 36 1.5× 12 0.6× 6 333
Alexander Sahn United States 5 82 0.5× 73 0.6× 21 0.8× 33 1.4× 20 1.0× 11 167

Countries citing papers authored by Honorata Mazepus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Honorata Mazepus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Honorata Mazepus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Honorata Mazepus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Honorata Mazepus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Honorata Mazepus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Honorata Mazepus. The network helps show where Honorata Mazepus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Honorata Mazepus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Honorata Mazepus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Honorata Mazepus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Honorata Mazepus. Honorata Mazepus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Larsen, Lars Thorup, et al.. (2025). Do Populists Listen to Expertise? A Five-Country Study of Authority, Arguments, and Expert Sources. Political Studies. 74(1). 306–330. 2 indexed citations
2.
Rimkutė, Dovilė & Honorata Mazepus. (2025). Citizens' perceptions of the legitimacy of independent agencies: The effects of expertise‐based and reputation‐sourced authority. Public Administration Review. 85(5). 1495–1511. 6 indexed citations
3.
Laustsen, Lasse, Honorata Mazepus, Florian van Leeuwen, Henrikas Bartusevičius, & Mark van Vugt. (2025). What traits do citizens value in leaders during war? Experimental and panel-based evidence from Ukraine in 2022. Political Science Research and Methods. 1–10.
6.
Inel, Oana, et al.. (2024). Framing is Mightier than the Sword: Detection of Episodic and Thematic Framing in News Media. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 11(1). 1–28. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mazepus, Honorata, et al.. (2024). Does Party Identification Matter for Deliberation? Evidence from the Poland Speaks Experiment. Political Studies Review. 22(4). 1055–1063. 1 indexed citations
8.
Toshkov, Dimiter, et al.. (2024). Enforcement and public opinion: the perceived legitimacy of rule of law sanctions. Journal of European Public Policy. 32(2). 550–577. 10 indexed citations
9.
Mazepus, Honorata, et al.. (2023). Information battleground: Conflict perceptions motivate the belief in and sharing of misinformation about the adversary. PLoS ONE. 18(3). e0282308–e0282308. 4 indexed citations
10.
Bartusevičius, Henrikas, Florian van Leeuwen, Honorata Mazepus, Lasse Laustsen, & Andreas Forø Tollefsen. (2023). Russia's attacks on civilians strengthen Ukrainian resistance. PNAS Nexus. 2(12). pgad386–pgad386. 2 indexed citations
11.
Toshkov, Dimiter & Honorata Mazepus. (2022). Does the Election Winner–Loser Gap Extend to Subjective Health and Well-Being?. Political Studies Review. 21(4). 783–800. 11 indexed citations
12.
Mazepus, Honorata, et al.. (2021). Civil society and external actors: how linkages with the EU and Russia interact with socio-political orders in Belarus and Ukraine. East European Politics. 37(1). 43–64. 8 indexed citations
13.
Mazepus, Honorata, et al.. (2020). Security, Civilisation and Modernisation: Continuity and Change in the Russian Foreign Policy Discourse. Europe Asia Studies. 73(7). 1215–1235. 11 indexed citations
14.
Mazepus, Honorata, et al.. (2020). When Business and Politics Mix: Local Networks and Socio-political Transformations in Ukraine. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures. 35(2). 437–459. 5 indexed citations
15.
Bor, Alexander, Honorata Mazepus, Scott Bokemper, & Peter DeScioli. (2020). When Should the Majority Rule? Experimental Evidence for Madisonian Judgments in Five Cultures. Journal of Experimental Political Science. 8(1). 41–50. 7 indexed citations
16.
Toshkov, Dimiter, et al.. (2019). Effects of Limited Access Orders on Science Policy and Scientific Cooperation. Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin). 1–37. 2 indexed citations
17.
Feldmann, Magnus & Honorata Mazepus. (2017). State-society relations and the sources of support for the Putin regime: bridging political culture and social contract theory. East European Politics. 34(1). 57–76. 17 indexed citations
18.
Mazepus, Honorata, et al.. (2017). A New Turn or More of the Same? A Structured Analysis of Recent Developments in Russian Foreign Policy Discourse. Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin). 1–36. 2 indexed citations
19.
Mazepus, Honorata. (2016). What makes authorities legitimate in the eyes of citizens? : an investigation of perceived legitimacy in different political regimes. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 1 indexed citations
20.
Mazepus, Honorata, et al.. (2016). A comparative study of legitimation strategies in hybrid regimes. Policy Studies. 37(4). 350–369. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026