Hock Ing Chiu
About
In The Last Decade
Hock Ing Chiu
11 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Biomaterials 123
- Materials Chemistry 88
- Biomedical Engineering 84
- Pharmaceutical Science 80
- Molecular Biology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Hock Ing Chiu
This map shows the geographic impact of Hock Ing Chiu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hock Ing Chiu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hock Ing Chiu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hock Ing Chiu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hock Ing Chiu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hock Ing Chiu. The network helps show where Hock Ing Chiu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hock Ing Chiu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hock Ing Chiu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hock Ing Chiu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hock Ing Chiu. Hock Ing Chiu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 64 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 53 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 82 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.