Hideaki Obata

79 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Hideaki Obata
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 424
  • Physiology 1.6k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 730
  • Pharmacology 517
  • Neurology 335
Replace Yoram Shir with:
Yoram Shir Canada
Karen Lund Canada
Vivianne L. Tawfik United States
Young Wook Yoon South Korea
Kirsty Bannister United Kingdom
Robert W. Gear United States
Vesa Kontinen Finland
Boris A. Chizh United Kingdom
Ellen Jørum Norway
Chih‐Shung Wong Taiwan
Hideaki Obata relative to Yoram Shir Canada Yoram Shir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Yoram Shir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hideaki Obata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hideaki Obata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hideaki Obata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hideaki Obata more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hideaki Obata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hideaki Obata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hideaki Obata. The network helps show where Hideaki Obata may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hideaki Obata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hideaki Obata Line = papers co-authored together Hideaki Obata links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017265
2 1995211
3 1999155
4 2008125
5 2006117
6 2001105
7 201271
8 200171
9 201271
10 201964
11 200557
12 200456
13 200851
14 200648
15 200047
16 201047
17 200546
18 200346
19 201746
20 200944

About Hideaki Obata

Hideaki Obata is a scholar working on Physiology, Surgery, Pharmacology, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (53 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (26 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (18 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (14 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (9 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (5 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (424 citations), Physiology (1.6k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (730 citations), Pharmacology (517 citations) and Neurology (335 citations). Hideaki Obata has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Shigeru Saito, Fumio Goto, James C. Eisenach, Keiji Ishizaki, Kunie Nakajima, Masafumi Kimura, Ken‐ichiro Hayashida, Takashi Suto, Koichi Nishikawa and Nao Fujita. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie, Pain and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact