H.‐G. Meyer

721 citations
32 papers · 560 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

H.‐G. Meyer

31 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

H.‐G. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Condensed Matter Physics 428
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 410
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 167
  • Artificial Intelligence 82
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 96
Replace Boris Chesca with:
Boris Chesca Germany
D Balashov Germany
M. Khabipov Germany
A. G. Sivakov Ukraine
L. Longobardi Italy
Dingping Li China
T. S. Tighe United States
Nicholas C. Koshnick United States
T. Holst Denmark
R. Shaikhaidarov United Kingdom
H.‐G. Meyer relative to Boris Chesca Germany Boris Chesca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Boris Chesca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.‐G. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.‐G. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.‐G. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.‐G. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.‐G. Meyer. The network helps show where H.‐G. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.‐G. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.‐G. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together H.‐G. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Calculation and Analysis of magnetic gradient tensor components of global magnetic models
20143
2 20119
3 200433
4 20022
5 2001143
6 20007
7 20002
8 19996
9 19990
10 199813
11 199862
12 19964
13 19943
14 19911
15 19901
16 19904
17 19894
18 19871
19 19841
20 19813

About H.‐G. Meyer

H.‐G. Meyer is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electrochemistry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (22 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (14 papers), Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques (10 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (6 papers), Magneto-Optical Properties and Applications (4 papers), Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (3 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (2 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (428 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (410 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (167 citations), Artificial Intelligence (82 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (96 citations). H.‐G. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Slovakia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include E. Il’ichev, H. E. Hoenig, R.P.J. IJsselsteijn, V. Zakosarenko, M. Grajcar, R. Hlubina, V. Schultze, A. A. Golubov, M. Yu. Kupriyanov and A. M. Zagoskin. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Physica C Superconductivity, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Journal of Applied Physics and Superconductor Science and Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026