E. Il’ichev

4.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
120 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

E. Il’ichev is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, E. Il’ichev has authored 120 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 100 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 52 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 49 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in E. Il’ichev's work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (64 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (52 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (48 papers). E. Il’ichev is often cited by papers focused on Quantum and electron transport phenomena (64 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (52 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (48 papers). E. Il’ichev collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Slovakia. E. Il’ichev's co-authors include M. Yu. Kupriyanov, A. A. Golubov, M. Grajcar, H.‐G. Meyer, A. Izmalkov, A. M. Zagoskin, Uwe Hübner, S. H. W. van der Ploeg, Alec Maassen van den Brink and H.‐G. Meyer and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

E. Il’ichev

114 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The current-phase relation in Josephson junctions

2004 1.0k citations M. Yu. Kupriyanov, E. Il’ichev et al. profile →

Peers

E. Il’ichev

AMPO

CMP

AI

EOMM

EEE

V. S. Shumeĭko Sweden

F. Tafuri Italy

Sergey K. Tolpygo United States

F. W. J. Hekking France

Andrei D. Zaikin Russia

A. B. Zorin Germany

Dmitry S. Golubev Germany

A. M. Zagoskin United Kingdom

C. J. Lobb United States

H. Pothier France

V. S. Shumeĭko Sweden

E. Il’ichev

2.4k ×0.8

AMPO

1.2k ×0.7

CMP

982 ×0.8

AI

224 ×0.4

EOMM

363 ×0.8

EEE

Citations per year, relative to E. Il’ichev E. Il’ichev (= 1×) peers V. S. Shumeĭko

Countries citing papers authored by E. Il’ichev

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Il’ichev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Il’ichev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Il’ichev more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Il’ichev

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Il’ichev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Il’ichev. The network helps show where E. Il’ichev may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Il’ichev

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Il’ichev. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Il’ichev based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. Il’ichev. E. Il’ichev is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Schmelz, Matthias, et al.. (2025). Measuring coherent dynamics of a superconducting qubit in an open waveguide. Applied Physics Letters. 127(4).

2.

Shaikhaidarov, R., Kyung Ho Kim, S. Linzen, et al.. (2024). Feasibility of the Josephson voltage and current standards on a single chip. Applied Physics Letters. 125(12). 1 indexed citations

3.

Linzen, S., E. Il’ichev, Matthias Schmelz, et al.. (2023). Superconducting NbN-Al hybrid technology for quantum devices. Low Temperature Physics. 49(1). 92–92. 2 indexed citations

4.

Il’ichev, E., Matthias Schmelz, S. Linzen, et al.. (2023). Reflection-enhanced gain in traveling-wave parametric amplifiers. Physical review. B.. 107(17). 6 indexed citations

5.

Shaikhaidarov, R., Kyung Ho Kim, S. Linzen, et al.. (2022). Quantized current steps due to the a.c. coherent quantum phase-slip effect. Nature. 608(7921). 45–49. 51 indexed citations

6.

Pankratov, A. L., et al.. (2022). Towards a microwave single-photon counter for searching axions. npj Quantum Information. 8(1). 30 indexed citations

7.

Ivanov, B. I., et al.. (2020). A wideband cryogenic microwave low-noise amplifier. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 11. 1484–1491. 3 indexed citations

8.

Ivanov, B. I., et al.. (2020). Cross Coupling of a Solid-State Qubit to an Input Signal due to Multiplexed Dispersive Readout. Physical Review Applied. 14(5). 13 indexed citations

9.

Oelsner, G., E. Il’ichev, & Uwe Hübner. (2018). Tuning the energy gap of a flux qubit by AC-Zeeman shift. arXiv (Cornell University). 7 indexed citations

10.

Il’ichev, E., M. V. Fistul, Ilya S. Besedin, et al.. (2018). Magnetically induced transparency of a quantum metamaterial composed of twin flux qubits. Nature Communications. 9(1). 150–150. 30 indexed citations

11.

Ivanov, B. I., et al.. (2016). Measurement of the superconducting flux qubit parameters in the quasi-dispersive regime. Physics of the Solid State. 58(11). 2155–2159. 5 indexed citations

12.

Ivanov, B. I., et al.. (2015). Experimental study of noise parameters in a microwave measurement system for flux qubit readout. 52–65. 4 indexed citations

13.

Macha, P., G. Oelsner, Michael Marthaler, et al.. (2014). Implementation of a quantum metamaterial using superconducting qubits. Nature Communications. 5(1). 5146–5146. 107 indexed citations

14.

Omelyanchouk, A. N., S. N. Shevchenko, Ya. S. Greenberg, O. V. Astafiev, & E. Il’ichev. (2010). Quantum behavior of a flux qubit coupled to a resonator. The scientific electronic library of periodicals of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine). 26 indexed citations

15.

Zagoskin, A. M., E. Il’ichev, Murray W. McCutcheon, Jeff F. Young, & Franco Nori. (2008). Controlled Generation of Squeezed States of Microwave Radiation in a Superconducting Resonant Circuit. Physical Review Letters. 101(25). 253602–253602. 59 indexed citations

16.

Ploeg, S. H. W. van der, A. Izmalkov, Alec Maassen van den Brink, et al.. (2007). Controllable Coupling of Superconducting Flux Qubits. Physical Review Letters. 98(5). 57004–57004. 136 indexed citations

17.

Grajcar, M., A. Izmalkov, S. H. W. van der Ploeg, et al.. (2005). Experimental realization of direct Josephson coupling between superconducting flux qubits. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

18.

Ovsyannikov, G. A., et al.. (2001). Observation of the second harmonic in the phase dependence of a superconducting current in Nb/Au/YBCO heterojunctions. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters. 73(7). 361–365. 4 indexed citations

19.

Il’ichev, E., M. Grajcar, R. Hlubina, et al.. (2001). Degenerate Ground State in a MesoscopicYBa2Cu3O7−xGrain Boundary Josephson Junction. Physical Review Letters. 86(23). 5369–5372. 143 indexed citations

20.

Il’ichev, E., et al.. (1994). Ion-beam etching facility. Instruments and Experimental Techniques. 37(3). 75–6. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact