Herzel Shabtai
About
In The Last Decade
Herzel Shabtai
7 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Neurology 294
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 86
- Clinical Psychology 81
- Pharmacology 59
- Psychiatry and Mental health 53
Countries citing papers authored by Herzel Shabtai
This map shows the geographic impact of Herzel Shabtai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herzel Shabtai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herzel Shabtai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herzel Shabtai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herzel Shabtai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herzel Shabtai. The network helps show where Herzel Shabtai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herzel Shabtai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herzel Shabtai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herzel Shabtai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Herzel Shabtai. Herzel Shabtai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56 | |
| 2 | 127 | |
| 3 | 117 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 8 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.