Herbert Seifert
Herbert Seifert
1 paper receiving 1 citation
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 10
- Political Science and International Relations 10
- History 9
- Music 4
- Museology 3
- Civil and Structural Engineering 1
Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Seifert
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Seifert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Seifert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Seifert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Seifert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Seifert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Seifert. The network helps show where Herbert Seifert may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Der Sig-prangende Hochzeit-Gott : Hochzeitsfeste am Wiener Hof der Habsburger und ihre Allegorik 1622-1699 | 2 |
| 5 | Die Oper am Wiener Kaiserhof im 17. Jahrhundert | 5 |
| 6 | 1 |
About Herbert Seifert
Herbert Seifert is a scholar working on Music, Classics and Cultural Studies, having authored 6 papers that have together received 12 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Influence and Diplomacy (5 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (4 papers) and Arts, Culture, and Music Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (4 citations), History (9 citations) and Museology (3 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Österreichische Musikzeitschrift.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.