Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Feigl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Feigl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Feigl more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Feigl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Feigl. The network helps show where Herbert Feigl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert Feigl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert Feigl.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert Feigl based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert Feigl. Herbert Feigl is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Feigl, Herbert & R. S. Cohen. (2012). Inquiries and Provocations: Selected Writings 1929-1974. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
Sarkar, Sahotra, Hans Reichenbach, Herbert Feigl, & Ernest Nagel. (1996). Logical empiricism and the special sciences : Reichenbach, Feigl, and Nagel. Garland Pub. eBooks.2 indexed citations
4.
Feigl, Herbert, Wilfrid Sellars, & Keith Lehrer. (1972). New readings in philosophical analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks.11 indexed citations
Feigl, Herbert. (1970). Research Programmes and Induction. PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1970. 147–150.
7.
Feigl, Herbert, Carl G. Hempel, Richard C. Jeffrey, et al.. (1970). Homage to Rudolf Carnap. PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1970. XI–LXVI.7 indexed citations
8.
Feigl, Herbert & Charles W. Morris. (1969). Bibliography and index.15 indexed citations
9.
Feigl, Herbert. (1966). El positivismo lógico despues de treinta y cinco años. Revista de occidente. 137–165.
Maxwell, Grover & Herbert Feigl. (1962). Scientific explanation, space, and time. University of Minnesota Press eBooks.103 indexed citations
12.
Feigl, Herbert & Grover Maxwell. (1961). Current issues in the philosophy of science : symposia of scientists and philosophers : proceedings of Section L of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1959. Holt, Rinehart and Winston eBooks.3 indexed citations
Barker, Stephen, Herbert Feigl, Michael Scriven, & Grover Maxwell. (1959). Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem.. The Philosophical Review. 68(3). 391–391.87 indexed citations
16.
Feigl, Herbert. (1958). The "mental" and the "physical". University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota). 2.219 indexed citations
Feigl, Herbert, May Brodbeck, & Paul G. Morrison. (1953). Readings in the Philosophy of Sci-ence. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 7(26).169 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.