Henry Tyne
Impact in
- Linguistics and Language top 10%
- French Language Learning Methods
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology
- Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
-
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Papers in
-
- French Language Learning Methods 7
- Linguistic Variation and Morphology 2
-
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 3
- EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning 3
- Co-authors
- Sylvie De Cock (1 shared paper)Françoise Gadet (2 shared papers)Alex Boulton (2 shared papers)Christophe Parisse (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Langage et société (1 paper)Linx (1 paper)HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) (2 papers)Pratiques (1 paper)Linguistik Online (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Henry Tyne
12 papers receiving 24 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 9
- Linguistics and Language 21
- Language and Linguistics 18
- Philosophy 12
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Henry Tyne
This map shows the geographic impact of Henry Tyne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry Tyne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry Tyne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henry Tyne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry Tyne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry Tyne. The network helps show where Henry Tyne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Henry Tyne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 7 | Introduction et remarques sur le point d'enquête PFC à Cherbourg | 2003 | 2 |
| 8 | La variation stylistique en L2 vue par le chercheur, vécue par le locuteur | 2004 | 1 |
| 9 | Ecological and Data-Driven Perspectives in French Language Studies | 2014 | 1 |
| 10 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 12 | La séduction du binaire | 2012 | 1 |
| 13 | 2004 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 0 |
About Henry Tyne
Henry Tyne is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 28 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Language Learning Methods (7 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (7 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (3 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (3 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (3 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (2 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (21 citations), Language and Linguistics (18 citations), Philosophy (12 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (7 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (3 citations). Henry Tyne has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sylvie De Cock, Françoise Gadet, Alex Boulton and Christophe Parisse. Their work appears in journals such as Langage et société, Linx, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Pratiques and Linguistik Online.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.