Helmut Schmidt

72 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Helmut Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 386
  • Pharmacology 284
  • Pharmacology 446
  • Physiology 582
  • Environmental Engineering 281
Replace Osamu Nagata with:
Osamu Nagata Japan
Michael Gruber Germany
Peiying Li China
K. L. Reed United States
Steven Roth United States
Roger Marthan France
I. S. Edelman United States
B Chance United States
Hülya Bayır United States
Jing Cao China
Helmut Schmidt relative to Osamu Nagata Japan Osamu Nagata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×17.6×
Osamu Nagata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helmut Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helmut Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helmut Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helmut Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helmut Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helmut Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helmut Schmidt. The network helps show where Helmut Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helmut Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helmut Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Helmut Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989468
2 2009181
3 2003180
4 1990177
5 2002165
6 2007149
7 2006145
8 2001138
9
G protein-independent G1 cell cycle block and apoptosis with morphine in adenocarcinoma cells: involvement of p53 phosphorylation.
2003131
10 201094
11 200889
12 200372
13 201070
14 200166
15 201064
16 200859
17 200658
18 201057
19 200957
20 200257

About Helmut Schmidt

Helmut Schmidt is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pharmacology, Pharmacology, Physiology and Sensory Systems, having authored 73 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling (12 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (7 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (6 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (5 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (4 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (386 citations), Pharmacology (284 citations), Pharmacology (446 citations), Physiology (582 citations) and Environmental Engineering (281 citations). Helmut Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Gerd Geißlinger, U. Schumann, Jörn Lötsch, Sabine Grösch, Carsten Skarke, Herbert Wolter, Irmgard Tegeder, Jutta Darimont, Carlo Angioni and Bernhard Brüne. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Biochemical Pharmacology, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids and British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026