Helen Zulch
- Genetics top 5%
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Speech and Hearing top 5%
- Equine top 1%
- Co-authors
- Daniel S. MillsLisa CollinsDan G. O’NeillKatharine L. AndersonRichard MeesonKevin McPeakeAnna WilkinsonChristos Karagiannis
- Topics
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies (30 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers)Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (6 papers)
- Cited by
- Small AnimalsEquineGenetics
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Helen Zulch
37 papers receiving 869 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Genetics 602
- Small Animals 467
- Social Psychology 139
- Speech and Hearing 118
- Equine 104
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Zulch
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Zulch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Zulch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Zulch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Zulch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Zulch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Zulch. The network helps show where Helen Zulch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Zulch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Zulch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Zulch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Zulch. Helen Zulch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 79 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | Prevalence, duration and risk factors for appendicular osteoarthritis in a UK dog population under primary veterinary carebreakdown → | 171 |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 42 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | Appreciating the role of fear and anxiety in aggressive behavior by dogs. | 2 |
About Helen Zulch
Helen Zulch is a scholar working on Small Animals, Equine and Sensory Systems, having authored 39 papers that have together received 926 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (30 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (13 papers) and Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (467 citations), Equine (104 citations) and Genetics (602 citations). Helen Zulch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Mills, Lisa Collins, Dan G. O’Neill, Katharine L. Anderson, Richard Meeson, Kevin McPeake, Anna Wilkinson, Christos Karagiannis, Dave C. Brodbelt and David B. Church. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.