Thomas W. Pike

3.1k total citations
75 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Thomas W. Pike is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas W. Pike has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 22 papers in Ecology and 13 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Thomas W. Pike's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (48 papers), Plant and animal studies (16 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (14 papers). Thomas W. Pike is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (48 papers), Plant and animal studies (16 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (14 papers). Thomas W. Pike collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Japan. Thomas W. Pike's co-authors include Marion Petrie, Jan Lindström, Kevin N. Laland, Jonathan D. Blount, Neil B. Metcalfe, Nick J. Royle, Oliver H. P. Burman, Anna Wilkinson, Daniel S. Mills and D. Charles Deeming and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Thomas W. Pike

72 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas W. Pike United Kingdom	29	1.4k	740	416	340	245	75	2.3k
Tim W. Fawcett United Kingdom	26	1.2k 0.9×	485 0.7×	411 1.0×	494 1.5×	200 0.8×	54	2.3k
Alecia J. Carter United Kingdom	21	1.3k 1.0×	667 0.9×	296 0.7×	694 2.0×	261 1.1×	48	1.9k
Tatjana Krama Latvia	31	1.4k 1.0×	861 1.2×	300 0.7×	262 0.8×	135 0.6×	93	2.6k
Julien G. A. Martin Canada	26	1.5k 1.1×	1.2k 1.6×	423 1.0×	412 1.2×	339 1.4×	72	2.3k
Indriķis Krams Latvia	41	2.3k 1.7×	1.5k 2.1×	551 1.3×	412 1.2×	219 0.9×	153	4.3k
Dominique Allainé France	32	1.4k 1.0×	1.8k 2.4×	644 1.5×	494 1.5×	261 1.1×	65	2.8k
L. M. Gosling United Kingdom	28	1.1k 0.8×	1.1k 1.5×	276 0.7×	491 1.4×	170 0.7×	49	2.3k
Harry H. Marshall United Kingdom	22	1.3k 0.9×	724 1.0×	296 0.7×	673 2.0×	257 1.0×	51	2.1k
Nick J. Royle United Kingdom	33	2.6k 1.9×	1.5k 2.0×	730 1.8×	414 1.2×	373 1.5×	64	3.7k
Alexander Scheuerlein Germany	25	1.9k 1.4×	1.8k 2.4×	536 1.3×	253 0.7×	338 1.4×	40	3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas W. Pike

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas W. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas W. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas W. Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas W. Pike

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas W. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas W. Pike. The network helps show where Thomas W. Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas W. Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas W. Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas W. Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas W. Pike. Thomas W. Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Burman, Oliver H. P., et al.. (2025). Visual lateralization as an indicator of animal welfare. Biology Letters. 21(10). 20250445–20250445.

Burman, Oliver H. P., et al.. (2025). Development of a dog owner caregiving style scale (Lincoln Owner Caregiving Questionnaire, LOCQ) and its relationship with behaviour problems in dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 287. 106628–106628.

Pike, Thomas W., et al.. (2024). Odour generalisation and detection dog training. Animal Cognition. 27(1). 73–73. 1 indexed citations

Pike, Thomas W., et al.. (2024). The impact of training method on odor learning and generalization in dogs (Canis lupus familiaris).. Journal of comparative psychology. 139(1). 3–12. 2 indexed citations

Pike, Thomas W. & Oliver H. P. Burman. (2023). Model aversiveness and the evolution of imperfect Batesian mimics. Behavioral Ecology. 34(5). 907–912. 1 indexed citations

Pike, Thomas W., et al.. (2020). Developing Diagnostic Frameworks in Veterinary Behavioral Medicine: Disambiguating Separation Related Problems in Dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 6. 499–499. 35 indexed citations

Burman, Oliver H. P., et al.. (2019). The impact of water pH on association preferences in fish. Ethology. 125(4). 195–202. 15 indexed citations

Guest, Claire, et al.. (2019). Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 5. 345–345. 26 indexed citations

Burman, Oliver H. P., et al.. (2017). Long-term memory of relative reward values. Biology Letters. 13(2). 20160853–20160853. 30 indexed citations

10.

Burman, Oliver H. P., et al.. (2016). Free Amino Acids Mediate Association Preferences in Fish. Ethology. 122(9). 712–716. 6 indexed citations

11.

Riemer, Stefanie, et al.. (2016). Dynamic changes in ear temperature in relation to separation distress in dogs. Physiology & Behavior. 167. 86–91. 49 indexed citations

12.

Mills, Daniel S., A. Feugier, Helen Zulch, et al.. (2014). Using Sniffing Behavior to Differentiate True Negative from False Negative Responses in Trained Scent-Detection Dogs. Chemical Senses. 39(9). 749–754. 42 indexed citations

13.

Pike, Thomas W., Jonathan D. Blount, Neil B. Metcalfe, & Jan Lindström. (2010). Dietary carotenoid availability and reproductive effort influence the age-related decline in performance. Behavioral Ecology. 21(5). 1048–1053. 11 indexed citations

14.

Pike, Thomas W., Jonathan D. Blount, Jan Lindström, & Neil B. Metcalfe. (2009). Dietary carotenoid availability, sexual signalling and functional fertility in sticklebacks. Biology Letters. 6(2). 191–193. 67 indexed citations

15.

Lindström, Jan, Thomas W. Pike, Jonathan D. Blount, & Neil B. Metcalfe. (2009). Optimization of Resource Allocation Can Explain the Temporal Dynamics and Honesty of Sexual Signals. The American Naturalist. 174(4). 515–525. 46 indexed citations

16.

Pike, Thomas W., Jonathan D. Blount, Jan Lindström, & Neil B. Metcalfe. (2007). Availability of non-carotenoid antioxidants affects the expression of a carotenoid-based sexual ornament. Biology Letters. 3(4). 353–356. 63 indexed citations

17.

Petrie, Marion, Peter Cotgreave, & Thomas W. Pike. (2007). Variation in the peacock’s train shows a genetic component. Genetica. 135(1). 7–11. 11 indexed citations

18.

Pike, Thomas W.. (2006). Fitness effects of parasite-mediated spatial heterogeneity within a swarm. Behavioral Ecology. 17(6). 992–997. 4 indexed citations

19.

Pike, Thomas W. & Marion Petrie. (2003). Potential mechanisms of avian sex manipulation. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 78(4). 553–574. 183 indexed citations

20.

Price, C. E. & Thomas W. Pike. (1969). The monogenean parasites of African fishes. VII. Dissolution of the family Protogyrodactylidae Johnston and Tiegs, 1922.. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington. 36(2). 260–264. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact