Deborah Goodwin

1.9k total citations
39 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Deborah Goodwin is a scholar working on Equine, Genetics and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Goodwin has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Equine, 14 papers in Genetics and 12 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Deborah Goodwin's work include Veterinary Equine Medical Research (22 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (13 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers). Deborah Goodwin is often cited by papers focused on Veterinary Equine Medical Research (22 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (13 papers) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (10 papers). Deborah Goodwin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Deborah Goodwin's co-authors include John W.S. Bradshaw, Asher Ornoy, Patricia A. Harris, S. Edelstein, H.P.B. Davidson, Dina Noff, Edward S. Redhead, Matthew O. Parker, S Wickens and Natalie Waran and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nucleic Acids Research and Animal Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Goodwin

35 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Goodwin United Kingdom 18 516 510 491 221 192 39 1.3k
Emanuela Dalla Costa Italy 22 642 1.2× 1.2k 2.4× 817 1.7× 496 2.2× 9 0.0× 69 1.8k
Machteld C. Van Dierendonck Netherlands 15 164 0.3× 431 0.8× 544 1.1× 105 0.5× 10 0.1× 19 767
Marco A. F. Lopes United States 17 64 0.1× 275 0.5× 600 1.2× 78 0.4× 13 0.1× 55 1.3k
Dirk Lebelt Italy 12 238 0.5× 648 1.3× 571 1.2× 171 0.8× 6 0.0× 13 866
Jean-Michel Faure France 22 426 0.8× 693 1.4× 206 0.4× 941 4.3× 5 0.0× 53 1.7k
D. Y. Downham United Kingdom 12 291 0.6× 764 1.5× 91 0.2× 449 2.0× 24 0.1× 17 1.1k
M. Albertini Italy 21 420 0.8× 200 0.4× 47 0.1× 58 0.3× 26 0.1× 96 1.3k
Diana Stucke Italy 7 180 0.3× 505 1.0× 403 0.8× 115 0.5× 7 0.0× 10 656
R. M. Enns United States 21 1.1k 2.1× 374 0.7× 41 0.1× 379 1.7× 12 0.1× 124 1.7k
Sarah Wolfensohn United Kingdom 17 348 0.7× 583 1.1× 53 0.1× 112 0.5× 19 0.1× 41 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Goodwin. The network helps show where Deborah Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Goodwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Goodwin. Deborah Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Verbiest, Marjolein, Ridvan Firestone, Deborah Goodwin, et al.. (2018). A Co-Designed, Culturally-Tailored mHealth Tool to Support Healthy Lifestyles in Māori and Pasifika Communities in New Zealand: Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Research Protocols. 7(8). e10789–e10789. 8 indexed citations
2.
Parker, Matthew O., Sebastian D. McBride, Edward S. Redhead, & Deborah Goodwin. (2009). Differential place and response learning in horses displaying an oral stereotypy. Behavioural Brain Research. 200(1). 100–105. 27 indexed citations
3.
Hart, Elaine, Deborah Goodwin, & Patricia A. Harris. (2008). Initial acceptance of novel flavours in diets offered to stabled horses.. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).
4.
Goodwin, Deborah, Paul McGreevy, Natalie Waran, & Andrew McClean. (2008). Horsemanship: Conventional, Natural and Equitation Science. Nucleic Acids Research. 18(8). 2017–24.
5.
Parker, Matthew O., Edward S. Redhead, Deborah Goodwin, & Sebastian D. McBride. (2008). Impaired instrumental choice in crib-biting horses (Equus caballus). Behavioural Brain Research. 191(1). 137–140. 43 indexed citations
6.
Goodwin, Deborah, Marsha Levine, & Paul McGreevy. (2008). Preliminary Investigation of Morphological Differences Between Ten Breeds of Horses Suggests Selection for Paedomorphosis. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 11(3). 204–212. 15 indexed citations
7.
Hall, Carol, Deborah Goodwin, Camie Heleski, Hayley Randle, & Natalie Waran. (2008). Is There Evidence of Learned Helplessness in Horses?. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 11(3). 249–266. 103 indexed citations
8.
Goodwin, Deborah, et al.. (2007). Proceedings of the 3rd International Equitation Science Conference. Michigan State University Press eBooks. 35(137). 58–69. 3 indexed citations
9.
Parker, Matthew O., et al.. (2006). The effectiveness of environmental enrichment on reducing stereotypic behaviour in two captive vicugna (Vicugna vicugna). Animal Welfare. 15(1). 59–62. 9 indexed citations
10.
Parker, Matthew O., et al.. (2006). Behavioural efficacy of environmental enrichment in the reduction of stereotypy in two captive vicugna (Vicugna vicugna). Animal Welfare. 15(1). 59–62. 7 indexed citations
11.
Minero, Michela, Amanda K. Warren-Smith, Andrew N. McLean, et al.. (2006). Proceedings of the 2nd International Equitation Science Symposium. 12 indexed citations
12.
Goodwin, Deborah, H.P.B. Davidson, & Patricia A. Harris. (2003). Promoting sensory variety in concentrate diets for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 4 indexed citations
13.
Goodwin, Deborah, et al.. (2003). The practicality of foraging enrichment for stabled horses and its effect on behaviour.. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 3 indexed citations
14.
Goodwin, Deborah, et al.. (2002). The effect of social environment on the development of object play in domestic horse foals. 74 Suppl 5. 495–9.
15.
Goodwin, Deborah, H.P.B. Davidson, & Patricia A. Harris. (2002). Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Equine Veterinary Journal. 34(7). 686–691. 57 indexed citations
16.
Bradshaw, John W.S. & Deborah Goodwin. (1999). Determination of behavioural traits of pure-bred dogs using factor analysis and cluster analysis; a comparison of studies in the USA and UK. Research in Veterinary Science. 66(1). 73–76. 34 indexed citations
17.
Bonde, Marianne & Deborah Goodwin. (1999). Behaviour of stabled horses when presented with different odours. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
18.
Harris, Patricia A., et al.. (1998). The effects of diet and exercise on the behaviour of stabled horses. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
19.
Goodwin, Deborah & John W.S. Bradshaw. (1998). Regulation of interactions between cats and humans by gaze and mutual gaze. Klinicheskaia khirurgiia. 44–5. 4 indexed citations
20.
Bradshaw, John W.S., Deborah Goodwin, Véronique Legrand‐Defretin, & Helen M.R. Nott. (1996). Food selection by the domestic cat, an obligate carnivore. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology. 114(3). 205–209. 94 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026