Helen Steed

4.0k citations
62 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Helen Steed

60 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Helen Steed
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 448
  • Reproductive Medicine 325
  • Oncology 411
  • Cancer Research 154
  • Surgery 224
Replace Wylam Faught with:
Wylam Faught Canada
Saketh R. Guntupalli United States
Yanhong Yu China
Kara L. Cushing‐Haugen United States
Valerie Capstick Canada
Julian C. Schink United States
P.H.B. Willemse Netherlands
Yasuhiro Udagawa Japan
Nathalie Chabbert‐Buffet France
Mary Anne Rossing United States
Helen Steed relative to Wylam Faught Canada Wylam Faught's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Wylam Faught · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Steed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Steed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Steed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Steed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Steed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Steed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Steed. The network helps show where Helen Steed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Steed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Steed Line = papers co-authored together Helen Steed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010211
2 2004144
3 2018110
4 200788
5 200985
6 200982
7 200681
8 201365
9 200264
10 201663
11 201858
12 201346
13 200641
14 200940
15 201040
16 201536
17 200435
18 200735
19 200633
20 201729

About Helen Steed

Helen Steed is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (17 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (8 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3 papers) and Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (448 citations), Reproductive Medicine (325 citations), Oncology (411 citations), Cancer Research (154 citations) and Surgery (224 citations). Helen Steed has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Valerie Capstick, Alexandra Schepansky, Wylam Faught, Michael B. Sawyer, Tiffany Wells, Stéphane Laframboise, Kerry S. Courneya, Yangxin Fu, Clare Stevinson and Aliya B. Ladha. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact