Julian C. Schink

5.3k citations
141 papers · 3.4k indexed · h-index 35

Julian C. Schink

140 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Julian C. Schink
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 959
  • Reproductive Medicine 981
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 704
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 983
  • Oncology 579
Replace Satoru Nagase with:
Satoru Nagase Japan
Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg Netherlands
Lukas Hefler Austria
Marian J.E. Mourits Netherlands
Kimberly K. Leslie United States
Matthew Burnell United Kingdom
Achim Rody Germany
Noriyuki Katsumata Japan
David Cibula Czechia
Martin Davidson United States
Julian C. Schink relative to Satoru Nagase Japan Satoru Nagase's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Satoru Nagase · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julian C. Schink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julian C. Schink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julian C. Schink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julian C. Schink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julian C. Schink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julian C. Schink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julian C. Schink. The network helps show where Julian C. Schink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Julian C. Schink, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julian C. Schink Line = papers co-authored together Julian C. Schink links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202410
2 20221
3 202023
4 201641
5 20141
6 201416
7 20144
8 20143
9 201338
10
Importance of salvage therapy in the management of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
201229
11 201250
12 2011110
13 2011128
14 201121
15 200952
16 200916
17 20028
18 199915
19
Ovarian carcinoma metastatic to the breast and axillary node.
199119
20 199032

About Julian C. Schink

Julian C. Schink is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Oncology, having authored 141 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (44 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (40 papers), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (22 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (11 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (10 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (10 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (10 papers) and Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (959 citations), Reproductive Medicine (981 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (704 citations). Julian C. Schink has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include John R. Lurain, Diljeet K. Singh, Alfred Rademaker, David S. Miller, Anna V. Hoekstra, David G. Mutch, John T. Soper, Gildàsio S. De Oliveira, Paul C. Fitzgerald and Robert J. McCarthy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026