Helen Delpar
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey M. PilcherFrank NinkovichMark Cronlund AndersonLinda B. HallAna Mariá LópezJ. E. KingFrank SaffordCharles M. Tatum
- Topics
- History and Politics in Latin America (14 papers)Historical Studies in Latin America (12 papers)Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Helen Delpar
33 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- Political Science and International Relations 73
- Cultural Studies 72
- Anthropology 62
- Demography 62
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Delpar
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Delpar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Delpar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Delpar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Delpar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Delpar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Delpar. The network helps show where Helen Delpar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Delpar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Delpar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Delpar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Delpar. Helen Delpar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | Rojos contra azules: el Partido liberal en la política colombiana, 1863-1899 | 6 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | Renegade or regenerator? Rafael Núñez as seen by Colombian historians | 1 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | The Liberal Record and Colombian Historiography; an Indictment in Need of Revision | 1 |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Helen Delpar
Helen Delpar is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Demography and Cultural Studies, having authored 39 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Politics in Latin America (14 papers), Historical Studies in Latin America (12 papers) and Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (72 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (33 citations) and Anthropology (62 citations). Helen Delpar has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M. Pilcher, Frank Ninkovich, Mark Cronlund Anderson, Linda B. Hall, Ana Mariá López, J. E. King, Frank Safford and Charles M. Tatum. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Geographical Journal and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.