Heather Shaw
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Education top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- David A. EllisBrittany I DavidsonSally AndrewsLukasz PiwekFenja ZieglerThomas WilcocksonKun GuoRichard Wiseman
- Topics
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents (11 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers)Social Media and Politics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Heather Shaw
20 papers receiving 877 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Sociology and Political Science 592
- Education 250
- Applied Psychology 188
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 140
- Information Systems and Management 117
Countries citing papers authored by Heather Shaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Shaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Shaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Shaw. The network helps show where Heather Shaw may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Shaw
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Shaw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Shaw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Shaw. Heather Shaw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Do smartphone usage scales predict behavior?breakdown → | 205 |
| 14 | 97 | |
| 15 | 64 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | Beyond Self-Report: Tools to Compare Estimated and Real-World Smartphone Usebreakdown → | 267 |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Heather Shaw
Heather Shaw is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Information Systems and Management and Communication, having authored 21 papers that have together received 898 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (11 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Social Media and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (188 citations), Information Systems and Management (117 citations) and Communication (113 citations). Heather Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include David A. Ellis, Brittany I Davidson, Sally Andrews, Lukasz Piwek, Fenja Ziegler, Thomas Wilcockson, Kun Guo, Richard Wiseman, Steven C. Bagley and Margaret Smith. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Computers in Human Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.