HC Diener
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Physiology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter J. GoadsbyMichel D. FerrariTJ SteinerRB LiptonHubertus PeilBernhard AicherV. PfaffenrathPeer Tfelt‐Hansen
- Topics
- Migraine and Headache Studies (35 papers)Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (17 papers)Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (9 papers)
- Journals
- CirculationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeurology
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
HC Diener
59 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.3k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
- Physiology 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 554
- Epidemiology 389
Countries citing papers authored by HC Diener
This map shows the geographic impact of HC Diener's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by HC Diener with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites HC Diener more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by HC Diener
This network shows the impact of papers produced by HC Diener. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by HC Diener. The network helps show where HC Diener may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of HC Diener
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of HC Diener. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of HC Diener based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with HC Diener. HC Diener is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | GLORIA-AF Investigators: Antithrombotic treatment patterns in 10,871 patients with newly diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation: the GLORIA-AF Registry Program, Phase II | 1 |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 103 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | Higher Aspirin Dose is Associated with Reduced Mortality and More Serious Bleeding in Patients with Recent Cerebrovascular or Coronary Ischemic Events: Insights from the BRAVO Trial | 1 |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 125 | |
| 14 | 107 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine: Second Editionbreakdown → | 549 |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 153 |
About HC Diener
HC Diener is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (35 papers), Trigeminal Neuralgia and Treatments (17 papers) and Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.4k citations) and Physiology (1.2k citations). HC Diener has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Goadsby, Michel D. Ferrari, TJ Steiner, RB Lipton, Hubertus Peil, Bernhard Aicher, V. Pfaffenrath, Peer Tfelt‐Hansen, Zaza Katsarava and Gereon Nelles. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.