Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Over-Educated American
1977420 citationsHarry F. Silberman et al.American Educational Research Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Harry F. Silberman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Harry F. Silberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harry F. Silberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harry F. Silberman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harry F. Silberman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harry F. Silberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harry F. Silberman. The network helps show where Harry F. Silberman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harry F. Silberman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harry F. Silberman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harry F. Silberman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Harry F. Silberman. Harry F. Silberman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1988). The Unfinished Agenda Revisited.. Vocational education journal. 63(7). 38–40.1 indexed citations
2.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1986). Improving the Status of High School Vocational Education.. Educational Horizons. 65(1). 5–9.6 indexed citations
3.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1984). Secondary Vocational Education Reform: The Unfinished Agenda.. 59(7). 27–29.
4.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1982). Education and work.1 indexed citations
5.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1979). High School Vocational Education: An Intrinsic Perspective.. 21(1). 46–51.2 indexed citations
6.
Silberman, Harry F. & Mark Ginsburg. (1976). Easing the transition from schooling to work. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).
7.
Ginsburg, Mark & Harry F. Silberman. (1976). Recommendations for practice and research. New Directions for Community Colleges. 1976(16). 115–119.5 indexed citations
8.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1975). Improving Work as a Socialization System.. Educational Horizons.1 indexed citations
9.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1975). Involving the Young.. Phi Delta Kappan.
Silberman, Harry F.. (1969). Computer-Managed Instruction: Use of a Computer to Monitor Student Performance.. Journal of Engineering Education.1 indexed citations
12.
Schwarcz, Robert, et al.. (1968). LINGUISTIC AND TUTORIAL MODELING FOR NATURAL LANGUAGE CAI. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).1 indexed citations
Silberman, Harry F., et al.. (1964). USE OF EXPLORATORY RESEARCH AND INDIVIDUAL TUTORING TECHNIQUES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROGRAMMING METHODS AND THEORY.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.