Harriet Woodside
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Janet LandeenCarolyn ByrneHelen KirkpatrickTerry KrupaSimon MercerSusan YoungRobert JonesNick Kates
- Topics
- Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers)Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers)
- Journals
- Psychiatric ServicesPsychiatric Rehabilitation JournalCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Harriet Woodside
19 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- General Health Professions 170
- Psychiatry and Mental health 125
- Clinical Psychology 101
- Social Psychology 95
- Applied Psychology 85
Countries citing papers authored by Harriet Woodside
This map shows the geographic impact of Harriet Woodside's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harriet Woodside with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harriet Woodside more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harriet Woodside
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harriet Woodside. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harriet Woodside. The network helps show where Harriet Woodside may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harriet Woodside
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harriet Woodside. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harriet Woodside based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Harriet Woodside. Harriet Woodside is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 54 | |
| 7 | 60 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 51 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | Maintenance as treatment: the Fennell Program Day Centre. | 3 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Harriet Woodside
Harriet Woodside is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Occupational Therapy and Philosophy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (85 citations), Occupational Therapy (51 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (125 citations). Harriet Woodside has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Janet Landeen, Carolyn Byrne, Helen Kirkpatrick, Terry Krupa, Simon Mercer, Susan Young, Robert Jones, Nick Kates and Patricia Case. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal and Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.