Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Harold D. Lasswell Harold D. Lasswell (= 1×)
peers
Peter Bachrach
Countries citing papers authored by Harold D. Lasswell
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Harold D. Lasswell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Harold D. Lasswell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harold D. Lasswell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Harold D. Lasswell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Harold D. Lasswell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Harold D. Lasswell. The network helps show where Harold D. Lasswell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Harold D. Lasswell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Harold D. Lasswell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Harold D. Lasswell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Harold D. Lasswell. Harold D. Lasswell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lasswell, Harold D.. (2020). In Collaboration with McDougal. Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver). 1(1). 9.
2.
McDougal, Myres S., Harold D. Lasswell, & Lung-chu Chen. (2019). Human Rights and World Public Order. Oxford University Press eBooks.2 indexed citations
3.
Lasswell, Harold D.. (1988). The Emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences : Policy Sciences. 3(4). 478.3 indexed citations
4.
Lasswell, Harold D.. (1979). The political writings of Harold D. Lasswell. Greenwood Press eBooks.37 indexed citations
5.
McDougal, Myres S., Lung-chu Chen, & Harold D. Lasswell. (1976). Human Rights of the Aged: An Application of the General Norm of Nondiscrimination. UF Law Scholarship Repository (University of Florida).2 indexed citations
6.
Lasswell, Harold D., Daniel Lerner, & John D. Montgomery. (1976). Values and development : appraising Asian experience. MIT Press eBooks.13 indexed citations
7.
McDougal, Myres S., Harold D. Lasswell, & Lung-chu Chen. (1975). Non-Conforming Political Opinion and Human Rights: Transnational Protection Against Discrimination. The Yale journal of international law. 1(1). 1.2 indexed citations
8.
Clark, Kenneth B., et al.. (1973). PUBLIC POLICY TOWARD ENVIRONMENT 1973: A REVIEW AND APPRAISAL.. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 216.
Lasswell, Harold D., et al.. (1952). The comparative study of elites. University Microfilms eBooks.57 indexed citations
18.
Lasswell, Harold D., et al.. (1951). Appointments and Staff Changes. American Political Science Review. 45(2). 529–533.1 indexed citations
19.
Lasswell, Harold D.. (1951). The world revolution of our time : a framework for basic policy research. University Microfilms eBooks.34 indexed citations
20.
Eulau, Heinz, Laura Thompson, T. W. Adorno, et al.. (1951). Social Science at the Crossroads. The Antioch Review. 11(1). 117–117.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.