Hao Gao
- Pharmacology top 0.2%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 86
- Fungal Biology and Applications 35
- Biotechnology top 0.2%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 30
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 86
- Fungal Biology and Applications 35
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 45
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 32
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 17
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 33
-
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 13
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (16 papers)Journal of Asian Natural Products Research (16 papers)Fitoterapia (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaJapanUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hao Gao
273 papers receiving 6.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Pharmacology 2.1k
- Biotechnology 905
- Complementary and alternative medicine 538
- Pharmacology 510
- Molecular Biology 2.8k
Countries citing papers authored by Hao Gao
This map shows the geographic impact of Hao Gao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hao Gao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hao Gao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hao Gao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hao Gao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hao Gao. The network helps show where Hao Gao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hao Gao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 72 |
About Hao Gao
Hao Gao is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biotechnology and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 286 papers that have together received 6.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (86 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (45 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (35 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (33 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (32 papers), Marine Sponges and Natural Products (30 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (17 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (2.1k citations), Biotechnology (905 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (538 citations). Hao Gao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Xin‐Sheng Yao, Guo‐Dong Chen, Dan Hu, Xin‐Sheng Yao, Kwok‐Fai So, Liang‐Dong Guo, Jia Xiao, Yang Yu, Rong‐Rong He and Kui Hong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Journal of Asian Natural Products Research, Fitoterapia, RSC Advances and Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.