Hans‐Ferdinand Angel
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Rüdiger J. SeitzRaymond F. PaloutzianMotoaki SugiuraLluís OviedoAnne L. C. RunehovFrederike T. FellendorfCrystal L. ParkAnn Taves
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Cognitive NeuroscienceEuropean Journal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- AustriaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Hans‐Ferdinand Angel
27 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cognitive Neuroscience 120
- Social Psychology 107
- Health 61
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- Clinical Psychology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Hans‐Ferdinand Angel
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans‐Ferdinand Angel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans‐Ferdinand Angel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans‐Ferdinand Angel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans‐Ferdinand Angel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans‐Ferdinand Angel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans‐Ferdinand Angel. The network helps show where Hans‐Ferdinand Angel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans‐Ferdinand Angel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans‐Ferdinand Angel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans‐Ferdinand Angel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans‐Ferdinand Angel. Hans‐Ferdinand Angel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 36 | |
| 12 | 40 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | Processes of believing: Where do they come from? What are they good for? [version 2; referees: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] | 1 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Hans‐Ferdinand Angel
Hans‐Ferdinand Angel is a scholar working on Religious studies, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 260 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (61 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (120 citations) and Social Psychology (107 citations). Hans‐Ferdinand Angel has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rüdiger J. Seitz, Raymond F. Paloutzian, Motoaki Sugiura, Lluís Oviedo, Anne L. C. Runehov, Frederike T. Fellendorf, Crystal L. Park, Ann Taves, Christof Körner and Nina Dalkner. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and European Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.