C. K. Rowland
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Law top 0.2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (8 papers)Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers)Legal and Constitutional Studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political ScienceThe Journal of Politics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
C. K. Rowland
18 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Economics and Econometrics 355
- Law 343
- Political Science and International Relations 107
- Sociology and Political Science 68
- Strategy and Management 64
Countries citing papers authored by C. K. Rowland
This map shows the geographic impact of C. K. Rowland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. K. Rowland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. K. Rowland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. K. Rowland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. K. Rowland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. K. Rowland. The network helps show where C. K. Rowland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of C. K. Rowland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of C. K. Rowland. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of C. K. Rowland based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with C. K. Rowland. C. K. Rowland is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psychological Perspectives on Juror Reactions to the September 11 Events; Terror Management Theory Would Predict More Punitive Jury Reactions, but the More Traditional Social-Cognition Approach May Still Predominate | 2 |
| 2 | Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts | 70 |
| 3 | The links between platform-based appointment criteria and trial judges' abortion judgments. | 6 |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 40 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 79 | |
| 11 | 80 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | Presidential Effects on Federal District Court Policy Decisions: Economic Liberalism, 1960-77. | 7 |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 22 |
About C. K. Rowland
C. K. Rowland is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and Strategy and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (8 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (343 citations), Economics and Econometrics (355 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (107 citations). C. K. Rowland has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert A. Carp, Lee Epstein, Richard C. Feiock and Donald R. Songer. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.