Hans Rott
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 38
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 19
- Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 18
- Logic, programming, and type systems 6
- AI-based Problem Solving and Planning 5
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 8
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 10
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 5
Hans Rott
66 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Artificial Intelligence 1.1k
- History and Philosophy of Science 103
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 329
- General Decision Sciences 29
- Philosophy 150
Countries citing papers authored by Hans Rott
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Rott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Rott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Rott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Rott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Rott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Rott. The network helps show where Hans Rott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hans Rott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | Inductive Reasoning With Difference-Making Conditionals | 2020 | 1 |
| 6 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 15 | Belief and meaning : essays at the interface | 2002 | 4 |
| 16 | Billigkeit und Nachsicht | 2000 | 1 |
| 17 | Logic and Choice. | 1998 | 2 |
| 18 | Logic, Action, and Information: Essays on Logic in Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence | 1995 | 10 |
| 19 | 1992 | 51 | |
| 20 | 1987 | 1 |
About Hans Rott
Hans Rott is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy, Theoretical Computer Science and Religious studies, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (38 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (19 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (18 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (10 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (1.1k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (103 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (329 citations), General Decision Sciences (29 citations) and Philosophy (150 citations). Hans Rott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Peter Gärdenfors, Maurice Pagnucco, Mary‐Anne Williams, André Fuhrmann, Eduardo Fermé, Sven Ove Hansson, Didier Dubois, Igor Douven, Georg Brun and James P. Delgrande. Their work appears in journals such as Erkenntnis, Synthese, Journal of Philosophical Logic, Studia Logica and Theoria.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.