Hans Ludwig Joos
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Applied Mathematics top 2%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Co-authors
- M. BöhmM. KrammerAnsgar DennerI. MontvayRobert SchraderG. KrämerJ. Trân Thanh VânA. H. Zímerman
- Topics
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (11 papers)Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (10 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandAustria
In The Last Decade
Hans Ludwig Joos
22 papers receiving 805 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 552
- Applied Mathematics 219
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 205
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 200
- Condensed Matter Physics 86
Countries citing papers authored by Hans Ludwig Joos
This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Ludwig Joos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Ludwig Joos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Ludwig Joos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hans Ludwig Joos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Ludwig Joos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Ludwig Joos. The network helps show where Hans Ludwig Joos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans Ludwig Joos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans Ludwig Joos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans Ludwig Joos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans Ludwig Joos. Hans Ludwig Joos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 108 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Gauge theories of strong and electroweak interactions | 15 |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 161 | |
| 10 | Eichtheorien der starken und elektroschwachen Wechselwirkung | 20 |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | Electromagnetic properties of hadrons in a relativistic quark model | 1 |
| 13 | 59 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 69 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 280 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Hans Ludwig Joos
Hans Ludwig Joos is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Theoretical Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 859 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (11 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (10 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (552 citations), Applied Mathematics (219 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (205 citations). Hans Ludwig Joos has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include M. Böhm, M. Krammer, Ansgar Denner, I. Montvay, Robert Schrader, G. Krämer, J. Trân Thanh Vân, A. H. Zímerman and M. Boehm. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics B, Physics Letters B and Communications in Mathematical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.