Hans de Jonge

642 total citations
27 papers, 417 citations indexed

About

Hans de Jonge is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Economics and Econometrics and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, Hans de Jonge has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 417 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 4 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in Hans de Jonge's work include Facilities and Workplace Management (11 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers) and Construction Project Management and Performance (3 papers). Hans de Jonge is often cited by papers focused on Facilities and Workplace Management (11 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers) and Construction Project Management and Performance (3 papers). Hans de Jonge collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Japan and Ireland. Hans de Jonge's co-authors include Alexandra den Heijer, Geert P.M.R. Dewulf, D.J.M. van der Voordt, Luca Bertolini, Bianca Kramer, Leentje Volker, Kristina Lauche, Johannes I.M. Halman, Monique Arkesteijn and Jeroen Bosman and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, Design Studies and International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Hans de Jonge

25 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Hans de Jonge Netherlands	11	164	140	96	93	61	27	417
Christopher Heywood Australia	13	183 1.1×	129 0.9×	92 1.0×	11 0.1×	78 1.3×	62	467
Egidario B. Aduwo Nigeria	12	42 0.3×	99 0.7×	63 0.7×	17 0.2×	66 1.1×	26	478
Yasmin Mohd Adnan Malaysia	10	49 0.3×	68 0.5×	32 0.3×	42 0.5×	74 1.2×	44	262
Mary Hardie Australia	11	49 0.3×	110 0.8×	155 1.6×	177 1.9×	33 0.5×	34	524
David Boyd United Kingdom	11	63 0.4×	162 1.2×	206 2.1×	27 0.3×	35 0.6×	58	428
Isabel Ortiz‐Marcos Spain	13	30 0.2×	66 0.5×	158 1.6×	60 0.6×	23 0.4×	42	400
Kahilu Kajimo‐Shakantu South Africa	10	67 0.4×	107 0.8×	94 1.0×	22 0.2×	29 0.5×	39	276
Djoen San Santoso Thailand	14	95 0.6×	176 1.3×	246 2.6×	7 0.1×	34 0.6×	41	613
Shu‐Ling Lu United Kingdom	9	68 0.4×	141 1.0×	183 1.9×	11 0.1×	26 0.4×	30	352

Countries citing papers authored by Hans de Jonge

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hans de Jonge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans de Jonge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans de Jonge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hans de Jonge

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans de Jonge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans de Jonge. The network helps show where Hans de Jonge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans de Jonge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans de Jonge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans de Jonge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hans de Jonge. Hans de Jonge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2025). Tracking transformative agreements through open metadata: Method and validation using Dutch Research Council NWO funded papers. Quantitative Science Studies. 6. 1215–1227.

Jonge, Hans de. (2023). Depicting Race. Nuncius. 38(1). 165–192.

Kramer, Bianca & Hans de Jonge. (2022). The availability and completeness of open funder metadata: Case study for publications funded by the Dutch Research Council. Quantitative Science Studies. 3(3). 583–599. 7 indexed citations

Bosman, Jeroen, et al.. (2021). Advancing open access in the Netherlands after 2020: from quantity to quality. Insights the UKSG journal. 34. 11 indexed citations

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2020). Guide to Creative Commons for Scholarly Publications and Educational Resources. Leiden Repository (Leiden University). 3 indexed citations

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2020). Beyond mandates: for open science to become a norm, it must be recognised and rewarded. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2018). Campus development as catalyst for innovation. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 20(2). 84–102. 10 indexed citations

Heijer, Alexandra den, et al.. (2017). The locations of innovation described through thirty-nine tech-campuses. Competitiveness Review An International Business Journal incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness. 28(1). 58–74. 6 indexed citations

Arkesteijn, Monique, et al.. (2017). Improving decision making in CRE alignment, by using a preference-based accommodation strategy design approach. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 19(4). 239–264. 3 indexed citations

10.

Heijer, Alexandra den, et al.. (2017). Assessment tools’ indicators for sustainability in universities: an analytical overview. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 18(1). 84–115. 99 indexed citations

11.

Jonge, Hans de. (2012). The Entrepreneurial City.. Volume !. 115. 1 indexed citations

12.

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2011). Management of Urban Development Processes in the Netherlands : Governance, Design, Feasibility. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 5 indexed citations

13.

Voordt, D.J.M. van der, et al.. (2010). Private Investment in Hospitals: A Comparison of Three Healthcare Systems and Possible Implications for Real Estate Strategies. HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 3(3). 70–86. 9 indexed citations

14.

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2009). Real estate & housing: Corporate real estate management: Designing an accommodation strategy (DAS Frame). Cancer Research. 59(22). 5856–7. 10 indexed citations

15.

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2008). Impact of real estate interventions on organisational performance. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 10(3). 208–223. 72 indexed citations

16.

Bertolini, Luca, et al.. (2006). Gaining insight in the development potential of station areas: A decade of node-place modelling in The Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research. 21(4). 443–462. 42 indexed citations

17.

Jonge, Hans de, et al.. (2005). Office cultures: International differences in workplace design. University of Twente Research Information. 81–96. 4 indexed citations

18.

Dewulf, Geert P.M.R., et al.. (2000). The impact of evolving structures on managing corporate real estate. Journal of Corporate Real Estate. 2(1). 58–67. 12 indexed citations

19.

Dewulf, Geert P.M.R., et al.. (2000). Successful corporate real estate strategies. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 29 indexed citations

20.

Dewulf, Geert P.M.R., et al.. (2000). What is corporate real estate. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 27–34. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact