This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Daalder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Daalder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Daalder more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Daalder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Daalder. The network helps show where Hans Daalder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans Daalder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans Daalder.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans Daalder based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hans Daalder. Hans Daalder is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lawson, Kay, Hans Daalder, Ronald J. Hrebenar, et al.. (1990). Political Parties: Inside and out. Comparative Politics. 23(1). 105–105.3 indexed citations
Daalder, Hans. (1983). The comparative study of European parties and party systems : an overview. Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute).15 indexed citations
15.
Daalder, Hans. (1979). Stein Rokkan 1921–1979: A Memoir. European Journal of Political Research. 7(4). 337–355.2 indexed citations
16.
Daalder, Hans. (1974). Politisering en lijdelijkheid in de Nederlandse politiek.17 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.