Hannah Ratcliffe

2.6k citations
28 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Hannah Ratcliffe

28 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Hannah Ratcliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 435
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 711
  • Finance 279
  • General Health Professions 664
  • Clinical Psychology 358
Replace Raymond Aborigo with:
Raymond Aborigo Ghana
Charles Ameh United Kingdom
Dena Javadi Switzerland
Pierre Fournier Canada
Anayda Portela Switzerland
Joanna Raven United Kingdom
Όλγα Σίσκου Greece
Sanghita Bhattacharyya India
Bibha Simkhada United Kingdom
Stephen Hodgins United States
Hannah Ratcliffe relative to Raymond Aborigo Ghana Raymond Aborigo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Raymond Aborigo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Ratcliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Ratcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Ratcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Ratcliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Ratcliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Ratcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Ratcliffe. The network helps show where Hannah Ratcliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hannah Ratcliffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hannah Ratcliffe Line = papers co-authored together Hannah Ratcliffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202212
2 20222
3 20213
4 2020162
5 202016
6 201932
7 20196
8 20186
9 2018112
10 2018135
11 2017112
12 2017110
13 201728
14 2016173
15 2016153
16 201685
17 201624
18 201475
19
CREATING AN EVIDENCE BASE FOR THE PROMOTION OF RESPECTFUL MATERNITY CARE
201310
20 200913

About Hannah Ratcliffe

Hannah Ratcliffe is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Finance, General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (16 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (10 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (8 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (5 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (435 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (711 citations), Finance (279 citations), General Health Professions (664 citations) and Clinical Psychology (358 citations). Hannah Ratcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Tanzania and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Lisa R. Hirschhorn, Asaf Bitton, Jérémy Veillard, Dan Schwarz, Ana Langer, David Sando, Lopa Basu, Gina Lagomarsino, Kathleen McDonald and Mary Mwanyika‐Sando. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Global Health, Reproductive Health, Health Policy and Planning, BMC Health Services Research and JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026