Hannah Pitt

1.7k total citations
81 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Hannah Pitt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Pitt has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 54 papers in Clinical Psychology, 35 papers in General Health Professions and 21 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Hannah Pitt's work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (52 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (22 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (14 papers). Hannah Pitt is often cited by papers focused on Gambling Behavior and Treatments (52 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (22 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (14 papers). Hannah Pitt collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Hannah Pitt's co-authors include Samantha Thomas, Mike Daube, Amy Bestman, Simone McCarthy, Melanie Randle, Sean Cowlishaw, Rebecca Cassidy, Jeffrey L. Derevensky, Melissa Stoneham and Elyse Warner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Pitt

74 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Pitt Australia 19 859 296 292 169 128 81 1.2k
Amy Bestman Australia 15 622 0.7× 140 0.5× 202 0.7× 149 0.9× 79 0.6× 32 765
Judy Rose Australia 10 714 0.8× 197 0.7× 254 0.9× 76 0.4× 148 1.2× 19 974
Simon Coulombe Canada 18 240 0.3× 220 0.7× 245 0.8× 57 0.3× 51 0.4× 63 889
Matilda Hellman Finland 14 345 0.4× 149 0.5× 195 0.7× 44 0.3× 197 1.5× 89 705
Peter Freedman-Doan United States 13 187 0.2× 122 0.4× 186 0.6× 84 0.5× 101 0.8× 25 689
Aliaksandr Amialchuk United States 18 176 0.2× 145 0.5× 239 0.8× 30 0.2× 63 0.5× 36 733
Sylvia Kairouz Canada 17 663 0.8× 257 0.9× 210 0.7× 90 0.5× 374 2.9× 67 1.1k
Carl Walker United Kingdom 14 198 0.2× 200 0.7× 141 0.5× 27 0.2× 43 0.3× 44 785
Michael S. Vaughn United States 20 345 0.4× 161 0.5× 737 2.5× 47 0.3× 52 0.4× 86 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Pitt. The network helps show where Hannah Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Pitt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Pitt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Pitt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Pitt. Hannah Pitt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murray, Michael T., et al.. (2025). Women’s views about the use of gendered Corporate Social Responsibility strategies by harmful industries. Globalization and Health. 21(1). 61–61.
2.
Thomas, Samantha, et al.. (2025). ‘Industry still has too loud a voice’: expert views on government policy consultations about gambling marketing. Health Promotion International. 40(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
McCarthy, Simone, et al.. (2025). “It’s all about the money.” Australian women’s perspectives about menopause and the commercial determinants of health. Health Promotion International. 40(5). 3 indexed citations
4.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2024). Adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights for ethnic minority girls in Vietnam. Health Promotion International. 39(1). 2 indexed citations
6.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2024). Australian parents’ perceptions of the risks posed by harmful products to the health of children. Health Promotion International. 39(6). 2 indexed citations
7.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2024). Children, young people and the Commercial Determinants of Health. Health Promotion International. 39(1). 16 indexed citations
8.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2023). The symbolic consumption processes associated with ‘low-calorie’ and ‘low-sugar’ alcohol products and Australian women. Health Promotion International. 38(6). 18 indexed citations
9.
Thomas, Samantha, Sean Cowlishaw, Joel M Francis, et al.. (2023). Global public health action is needed to counter the commercial gambling industry. Health Promotion International. 38(5). 16 indexed citations
10.
Thomas, Samantha, et al.. (2023). Australian young people’s perceptions of the commercial determinants of the climate crisis. Health Promotion International. 38(3). 19 indexed citations
11.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2023). Supporting young people as genuine political actors in climate decision-making. Health Promotion International. 38(6). 10 indexed citations
13.
Thomas, Samantha, et al.. (2023). The impact of responsible gambling framing on people with lived experience of gambling harm. Frontiers in Sociology. 8. 1074773–1074773. 10 indexed citations
14.
Pitt, Hannah, Simone McCarthy, Samantha Thomas, et al.. (2023). Older adults' perceptions of the risks associated with contemporary gambling environments: Implications for public health policy and practice. Frontiers in Sociology. 8. 1061872–1061872. 2 indexed citations
15.
McCarthy, Simone, Samantha Thomas, Hannah Pitt, et al.. (2022). “They loved gambling more than me.” Women's experiences of gambling‐related harm as an affected other. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 34(2). 284–293. 15 indexed citations
16.
Pitt, Hannah, Samantha Thomas, Melanie Randle, et al.. (2022). Young people in Australia discuss strategies for preventing the normalisation of gambling and reducing gambling harm. BMC Public Health. 22(1). 956–956. 16 indexed citations
17.
McCarthy, Simone, et al.. (2022). Women's perceptions of strategies to address the normalisation of gambling and gambling‐related harm. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 46(6). 821–828. 7 indexed citations
18.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2020). Weighing up the risks and benefits of community gambling venues as recreational spaces for people with lifelong disability. BMC Public Health. 20(1). 916–916. 5 indexed citations
19.
Bestman, Amy, Samantha Thomas, Melanie Randle, Hannah Pitt, & Mike Daube. (2018). Attitudes towards community gambling venues and support for regulatory reform: an online panel study of residents in New South Wales, Australia. Harm Reduction Journal. 15(1). 15–15. 16 indexed citations
20.
Pitt, Hannah, Samantha Thomas, & Amy Bestman. (2016). Initiation, influence, and impact: adolescents and parents discuss the marketing of gambling products during Australian sporting matches. BMC Public Health. 16(1). 967–967. 56 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026