Simone McCarthy

688 total citations
39 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Simone McCarthy is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Simone McCarthy has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Clinical Psychology, 15 papers in General Health Professions and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Simone McCarthy's work include Gambling Behavior and Treatments (18 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (6 papers). Simone McCarthy is often cited by papers focused on Gambling Behavior and Treatments (18 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (6 papers). Simone McCarthy collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Simone McCarthy's co-authors include Hannah Pitt, Samantha Thomas, Mike Daube, Rebecca Cassidy, Maria Bellringer, Sean Cowlishaw, Melanie Randle, Amy Bestman, Marita Hennessy and Samantha M. Thomas and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Simone McCarthy

35 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Simone McCarthy Australia 14 276 124 87 68 46 39 445
Amy Bestman Australia 15 622 2.3× 140 1.1× 202 2.3× 40 0.6× 79 1.7× 32 765
Cassandra de Lacy‐Vawdon Australia 8 87 0.3× 112 0.9× 34 0.4× 123 1.8× 34 0.7× 12 308
George T. Patterson United States 12 218 0.8× 142 1.1× 176 2.0× 38 0.6× 9 0.2× 32 519
Margaret Tiyce Australia 10 228 0.8× 113 0.9× 108 1.2× 37 0.5× 45 1.0× 18 360
Yagoub Yousif Al‐Kandari Kuwait 11 75 0.3× 53 0.4× 128 1.5× 14 0.2× 28 0.6× 25 354
Louise Holdsworth Australia 15 447 1.6× 243 2.0× 105 1.2× 17 0.3× 83 1.8× 34 614
Catherine Swann United Kingdom 10 119 0.4× 186 1.5× 94 1.1× 13 0.2× 15 0.3× 17 412
Li-Fen Feng China 7 75 0.3× 206 1.7× 110 1.3× 142 2.1× 9 0.2× 9 443
Francesco Renna United States 9 38 0.1× 101 0.8× 47 0.5× 18 0.3× 42 0.9× 26 325
Javier M. Rodríguez United States 13 49 0.2× 260 2.1× 129 1.5× 22 0.3× 11 0.2× 26 507

Countries citing papers authored by Simone McCarthy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simone McCarthy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simone McCarthy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simone McCarthy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simone McCarthy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simone McCarthy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simone McCarthy. The network helps show where Simone McCarthy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Simone McCarthy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Simone McCarthy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Simone McCarthy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Simone McCarthy. Simone McCarthy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murray, Michael T., et al.. (2025). Women’s views about the use of gendered Corporate Social Responsibility strategies by harmful industries. Globalization and Health. 21(1). 61–61.
2.
Thomas, Samantha, et al.. (2025). ‘Industry still has too loud a voice’: expert views on government policy consultations about gambling marketing. Health Promotion International. 40(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
McCarthy, Simone, et al.. (2025). “It’s all about the money.” Australian women’s perspectives about menopause and the commercial determinants of health. Health Promotion International. 40(5). 3 indexed citations
4.
McCarthy, Simone, et al.. (2025). “Help young women to survive”: the cost-of-living crisis and the well-being of younger Australian women. Health Promotion International. 41(1).
5.
7.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2024). Australian parents’ perceptions of the risks posed by harmful products to the health of children. Health Promotion International. 39(6). 2 indexed citations
8.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2024). Children, young people and the Commercial Determinants of Health. Health Promotion International. 39(1). 16 indexed citations
9.
Pitt, Hannah, Samantha Thomas, Simone McCarthy, et al.. (2024). Developing structures to support researchers studying health-harming industries. Health Promotion International. 39(6). 1 indexed citations
10.
Pitt, Hannah, Simone McCarthy, Melanie Randle, Mike Daube, & Samantha Thomas. (2024). Young people’s views about the use of celebrities and social media influencers in gambling marketing. Health Promotion International. 39(1). 11 indexed citations
11.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2023). The symbolic consumption processes associated with ‘low-calorie’ and ‘low-sugar’ alcohol products and Australian women. Health Promotion International. 38(6). 18 indexed citations
12.
Thomas, Samantha, Sean Cowlishaw, Joel M Francis, et al.. (2023). Global public health action is needed to counter the commercial gambling industry. Health Promotion International. 38(5). 16 indexed citations
13.
Pitt, Hannah, et al.. (2023). Supporting young people as genuine political actors in climate decision-making. Health Promotion International. 38(6). 10 indexed citations
14.
Pitt, Hannah, Simone McCarthy, Samantha Thomas, et al.. (2023). Older adults' perceptions of the risks associated with contemporary gambling environments: Implications for public health policy and practice. Frontiers in Sociology. 8. 1061872–1061872. 2 indexed citations
15.
McCarthy, Simone, Samantha Thomas, Hannah Pitt, et al.. (2022). “They loved gambling more than me.” Women's experiences of gambling‐related harm as an affected other. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 34(2). 284–293. 15 indexed citations
16.
McCarthy, Simone, et al.. (2022). Women's perceptions of strategies to address the normalisation of gambling and gambling‐related harm. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 46(6). 821–828. 7 indexed citations
17.
McCarthy, Simone, Samantha Thomas, Hannah Pitt, & Maria Bellringer. (2021). “You don't really see the dangers of it at the time.” Risk perceptions and behaviours of older female gamblers. Social Science & Medicine. 272. 113674–113674. 13 indexed citations
18.
McCarthy, Simone, Samantha Thomas, Hannah Pitt, Mike Daube, & Rebecca Cassidy. (2020). ‘It's a tradition to go down to the pokies on your 18th birthday’ – the normalisation of gambling for young women in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 44(5). 376–381. 26 indexed citations
19.
McCarthy, Simone, Samantha Thomas, Maria Bellringer, & Rebecca Cassidy. (2019). Women and gambling-related harm: a narrative literature review and implications for research, policy, and practice. Harm Reduction Journal. 16(1). 18–18. 49 indexed citations
20.
McCarthy, Simone, Samantha Thomas, Melanie Randle, et al.. (2018). Women’s gambling behaviour, product preferences, and perceptions of product harm: differences by age and gambling risk status. Harm Reduction Journal. 15(1). 22–22. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026