Hannah Lester

574 total citations
19 papers, 439 citations indexed

About

Hannah Lester is a scholar working on Small Animals, Animal Science and Zoology and Equine. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Lester has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 439 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Small Animals, 13 papers in Animal Science and Zoology and 6 papers in Equine. Recurrent topics in Hannah Lester's work include Helminth infection and control (11 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (8 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (6 papers). Hannah Lester is often cited by papers focused on Helminth infection and control (11 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (8 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (6 papers). Hannah Lester collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Hannah Lester's co-authors include Jacqueline B. Matthews, Eric R. Morgan, Jane E. Hodgkinson, Valerie Relf, Kirstie Pickles, B. C. McGorum, David J. Bartley, Karen Coumbe, T. S. Mair and Jacqueline B. Matthews and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Food Science & Technology, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research and Frontiers in Pharmacology.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Lester

17 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Lester United Kingdom 11 393 239 174 101 88 19 439
Valerie Relf United Kingdom 8 364 0.9× 195 0.8× 142 0.8× 98 1.0× 96 1.1× 8 392
Jennifer L. Bellaw United States 13 407 1.0× 181 0.8× 116 0.7× 187 1.9× 140 1.6× 22 450
J.A. Scare United States 11 351 0.9× 167 0.7× 90 0.5× 151 1.5× 108 1.2× 24 383
Anne Beasley Australia 12 316 0.8× 149 0.6× 81 0.5× 91 0.9× 106 1.2× 27 366
Jacqueline B. Matthews United Kingdom 13 323 0.8× 132 0.6× 75 0.4× 155 1.5× 117 1.3× 19 387
D.C.K. van Doorn Netherlands 12 282 0.7× 114 0.5× 69 0.4× 116 1.1× 121 1.4× 17 333
Christine Uhlinger United States 12 313 0.8× 162 0.7× 165 0.9× 94 0.9× 78 0.9× 19 436
Nicole Catherine Wirtherle Germany 8 296 0.8× 184 0.8× 39 0.2× 139 1.4× 105 1.2× 8 342
I. Francisco Spain 12 375 1.0× 161 0.7× 24 0.1× 196 1.9× 164 1.9× 33 445
T. M. Craig United States 11 246 0.6× 144 0.6× 39 0.2× 151 1.5× 99 1.1× 24 377

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Lester

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Lester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Lester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Lester more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Lester

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Lester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Lester. The network helps show where Hannah Lester may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Lester

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Lester. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Lester based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Lester. Hannah Lester is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Nzekoue, Franks Kamgang, et al.. (2025). Integrative multi-omics modeling for cultivated meat production, quality, and safety. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 166. 105364–105364.
2.
Rivero‐Pino, Fernando, et al.. (2025). In silico analyses as a tool for regulatory assessment of protein digestibility: Where are we?. Computational Toxicology. 35. 100372–100372.
3.
Collins, Joseph M., et al.. (2023). A frequent CYP2D6 variant promotes skipping of exon 3 and reduces CYP2D6 protein expression in human liver samples. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 14. 1186540–1186540. 2 indexed citations
4.
Männer, K., et al.. (2021). Ferric citrate is a safe and digestible source of iron in broilers and piglets. PeerJ. 9. e12636–e12636. 4 indexed citations
5.
Peris, Joanna, Hannah Lester, Karen A. Scott, et al.. (2021). Conditioned social preference and reward value of activating oxytocin‐receptor‐expressing ventral tegmental area neurons following repeated daily binge ethanol intake. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. 46(2). 194–206. 3 indexed citations
6.
Skoufos, Ioannis, Athina Tzora, Ιlias Giannenas, et al.. (2019). Evaluation of in-field efficacy of dietary ferric tyrosine on performance, intestinal health and meat quality of broiler chickens exposed to natural Campylobacter jejuni challenge. Livestock Science. 221. 44–51. 11 indexed citations
7.
Currie, Dorothy, Panos Soultanas, Εlinor ΜcCartney, et al.. (2018). Dietary supplementation with ferric tyrosine improves zootechnical performance and reduces caecal Campylobacter spp. load in broilers. British Poultry Science. 59(6). 646–653. 5 indexed citations
8.
Lester, Hannah, Eric R. Morgan, Jane E. Hodgkinson, & Jacqueline B. Matthews. (2017). Analysis of Strongyle Egg Shedding Consistency in Horses and Factors That Affect It. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 60. 113–119.e1. 19 indexed citations
9.
Kelly, Louise, et al.. (2017). Investigating anthelmintic efficacy against gastrointestinal nematodes in cattle by considering appropriate probability distributions for faecal egg count data. International Journal for Parasitology Drugs and Drug Resistance. 7(1). 71–82. 11 indexed citations
10.
Matthews, Jacqueline B. & Hannah Lester. (2015). Control of equine nematodes: making the most of faecal egg counts. In Practice. 37(10). 540–544. 11 indexed citations
11.
Relf, Valerie, Hannah Lester, Eric R. Morgan, Jane E. Hodgkinson, & Jacqueline B. Matthews. (2014). Anthelmintic efficacy on UK Thoroughbred stud farms. International Journal for Parasitology. 44(8). 507–514. 81 indexed citations
12.
Lester, Hannah, David J. Bartley, Eric R. Morgan, et al.. (2013). Anthelmintic efficacy against cyathostomins in horses in Southern England. Veterinary Parasitology. 197(1-2). 189–196. 90 indexed citations
13.
Lester, Hannah, Eric R. Morgan, Kirstie Pickles, et al.. (2013). A questionnaire study of equine gastrointestinal parasite control in S cotland. Equine Veterinary Journal. 46(1). 25–31. 49 indexed citations
14.
Lester, Hannah, et al.. (2013). An investigation of anthelmintic efficacy against strongyles on equine yards in S cotland. Equine Veterinary Journal. 46(1). 17–24. 50 indexed citations
15.
Lester, Hannah & Jacqueline B. Matthews. (2013). Faecal worm egg count analysis for targeting anthelmintic treatment in horses: Points to consider. Equine Veterinary Journal. 46(2). 139–145. 52 indexed citations
16.
Lester, Hannah, et al.. (2013). A cost comparison of faecal egg count‐directed anthelmintic delivery versus interval programme treatments in horses. Veterinary Record. 173(15). 371–371. 25 indexed citations
17.
Lester, Hannah, David J. Bartley, Eric R. Morgan, Jane E. Hodgkinson, & Jonathan C. F. Matthews. (2012). The spatial distribution of strongyle eggs in horse faeces. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 32(10). S33–S34. 10 indexed citations
18.
Lester, Hannah, et al.. (2012). A comparison of three methods for calculating anthelmintic efficacy in equids. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 32(10). S34–S35. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026